And sorry Joe13 B-) 2.0 2.0") , your defence regarding security platforms sounds like a highly logical reason to support MS's decision, however, aside from nanostructure changes & gen- to- gen performance boosts, the list of approved CPU's issued by Microsoft do not support your theory and are inconsistent. Plus Windows security can be handled within BIOS & in other ways
It does sound so, probably because many users ask the same question- "why isn't this processor supported?"
>>So, I put it to a qualified Microsoft technician (not sales, admin, customer services or similar) to assist in this thread & please, share the test results for the i7 6700 & demonstrate the exact area where performance was unstable?
I know a lot of users who are running 11 on the 6700HQ. And I know many of them reported that there were no performance issues. I never mentioned about it my reply. All I talked about was security, so that part of your reply doesn't make any sense to me.
>>aside from nanostructure changes & gen- to- gen performance boosts, the list of approved CPU's issued by Microsoft do not support your theory and are inconsistent
It's obviously pointless that you're blaming me for Microsoft's theory. I never made any theories, nor collabed with MS and decide on the processor list.
>>There is absolutely NO CHANCE Microsoft found creditable negative results in running Windows 11 alongside this processor.
Not true.
>>before many have to part with serious money on new CPU's & motherboards, or an entire new PC.
And hey, we never recommend you to buy a new PC. If you're OK with 10, stay with it after 2025. OK?