For now, Publisher 2013 is the worst
version that has ever been created.
I also had to virtually install Publisher 2010
just to print the file.
Absolutely. The biggest issue is that we don't even know if Microsoft are aware that Publisher 2013 is FUBAR. Without an obvious way to alert them to the fault it may go undiscovered by their team for a long time...
Microsoft is aware of the bug and even this thread.
There is this site for reporting bugs: http://support.microsoft.com/gp/contactbug/en-us
Feel free to report the problem yourself. Perhaps with multiple people reporting this bug, MS will get it fixed sooner. The squeaky wheel gets the grease...
I have not found a feedback site for Office 2013 like this one for Office 2010
http://mymfe.microsoft.com/Office/Feedback.aspx?formID=375
Perhaps you could still submit feedback for Office 2013 until there is a site.
In the meantime revert to Pub 2010 or older versions, use a different PDF tool, or perhaps convert the objects such as the Excel charts, etc to 300 dpi PNG files and then insert them into Publisher rather than importing the objects directly from Excel...
If anyone else has other potential workarounds, please post.
FWIW it appears that this may not be the only problem with Publisher 2013. Some users have also reported that when they open publications made in previous versions that the text is rendered differently and requires the page layouts to be edited. This may
be a Windows 8 problem. Also the CYMK color options have been stripped from Publisher 2013 "by design" which negatively affects producing publications for commercial printing. I expect more 'problems' will be discovered as more people start using Publisher
2013.
I am also not a big fan of the fact that you can only install Publisher 2013 or any of the retail versions of Office 2013 to just one computer.
I wish I could offer more promising news but maybe staying with Publisher 2010 or older versions of Office is the best option until or if MS fixes the bugs and problems with 2013. New does not necessarily mean better...
DavidF