Including one of osm101's earlier responses that folks might have missed that gives information on feedback mechanisms.
Yep, this has been a frustrating thread.
However, to give Microsoft their dues, since this thread was first created I think they've improved the ease and discoverability of means to provide feedback, at least in the most modern version of Windows and recently overhauled
apps and web services.
In Windows 10 there is a dedicated Windows feedback app in which you can provide feedback on Windows or Microsoft's bundled metro apps (Mail, Calendar, Calulator, Groove Music etc). The app provides a public tally of which are the
most popular ideas/bug reports which you can just upvote if you wish rather than creating a brand new idea. You can also launch this app from the settings section of Micorosft's various metro apps.
http://www.windowscentral.com/all-windows-10-users-can-use-windows-feedback-app-windows-insiders-get-extra-features
Its also now easy to provide feedback on various online services (Outlook.com, OneDrive, Office Online). Just click the gear or hamburger icon in the top right hand corner and you'll see a send feedback option. I have received personal
responses on some of the feedback I've provided through this form.
The various Microsoft apps I use on my Android phone have a send feedback option in the settings menu.
The main thing missing (at least for those who have upgraded to Windows 10) is an easy way to provide on the Windows desktop version of Office. Hoefully this will come with Office 2016. Making it easier to provide feedback on Microsoft
hardware is also still needed.
As an ex-Microsoft employee, it seems to me that getting one feedback mechanism may only occur if it is somehow brought to Satya's attention or perhaps to the attention of someone like Julie Larson-Green, who as of 2014, apparently worked/works with folks
on One Microsoft initiatives (http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/02/24/former-microsoft-hardware-chief-julie-larson-green-moves-to-new-job/).
It might also be helpful to lobby folks like Mary Jo Foley (zdnet.com) or Paul Thurrott (thurrott.com), pundits who are heard within Microsoft.
From my experience, people at Ashley's level are not in a position to affect change to the degree requested by this thread. Even if she gets a request onto someone's list of a million things to do, there needs to be something more compelling to make handling
the request a high enough priority. Not that the request formulated in the thread doesn't have merit; it does. But, realistically, it is just one more request in a never-ending list of requests.
To make such a change, you have to get to the decision makers and they have to be shown the benefit in making such a change, the risks/ramifications of not making the change, and, if possible, some idea of the number of people that it will be a benefit to
or that it is a detriment to. One of the posts above mentioned Apple having a better feedback mechanism. That is a potentially good piece of supporting data. But those making the decisions on such a mechanism at Microsoft need more than that.
That's why I suggest that folks start inundating people who are heard with this request. If Mary Jo Foley or Paul Thurrott start hearing about frustration/unrest due to the difficulties of providing feedback to Microsoft and they stay true to their character
so far, it seems that they would say something about it online. I mention them first, because I don't know the internal email addresses for Satya or Julie. If anyone does and wants to share them, I for one, am up for writing them an email stating the concerns/request
of this thread.
My two cents... :-)