System Recovered From a Serious Error

Anonymous
2013-02-08T02:49:55+00:00

I had the a similar problem about a month ago

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows\_xp-system/the-system-has-recovered-from-a-serious-error/da1629fc-32e0-4737-a5ff-63bf6003ddb2?page=1&tab=AllReplies

Thought it was fixed with all the great help I got here, but a day or so ago I rebooted and chkdsc came on without me scheduling it, then this morning I found my computer had crashed during the night ..

here's some Info-

Win XP Home 2002 SP III

Computer is getting old, Inter (R) Pentium 4CPU 240 GHz, 1.5 GB Ram

I Mainly use FFox

No idea about IDE drives or SATA drives

I have Avast free and Win Firewall

I have a CD and DVD but hardly ever use them

I don't know if I have a genuine bootable XP installation CD

Computer boots fairly well and fast

here's my System Summary-

OS Name    Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition

Version    5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Build 2600

OS Manufacturer    Microsoft Corporation

System Name   

System Manufacturer    Dell Computer Corporation

System Model    Dimension 4600

System Type    X86-based PC

Processor    x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 7 GenuineIntel ~2394 Mhz

BIOS Version/Date    Dell Computer Corporation A07, 11/6/2003

SMBIOS Version    2.3

Windows Directory    C:\windows

System Directory    C:\windows\system32

Boot Device    \Device\HarddiskVolume1

Locale    United States

Hardware Abstraction Layer    Version = "5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-2111)"

User Name   

Time Zone    Pacific Standard Time

Total Physical Memory    1,536.00 MB

Available Physical Memory    653.13 MB

Total Virtual Memory    2.00 GB

Available Virtual Memory    1.96 GB

Page File Space    3.35 GB

Page File    C:\pagefile.sys

My Display Info-

Name    NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200

PNP Device ID    PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0322&SUBSYS_80DF1043&REV_A1\4&1246FE7B&0&0008

Adapter Type    GeForce FX 5200, NVIDIA compatible

Adapter Description    NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200

Adapter RAM    128.00 MB (134,217,728 bytes)

Installed Drivers    nv4_disp.dll

Driver Version    6.14.11.7519

INF File    oem36.inf (nv4_NV3x section)

Color Planes    1

Color Table Entries    4294967296

Resolution    1024 x 768 x 60 hertz

Bits/Pixel    32

Memory Address    0xFD000000-0xFEAFFFFF

Memory Address    0xF0000000-0xF7FFFFFF

IRQ Channel    IRQ 16

I/O Port    0x000003B0-0x000003BB

I/O Port    0x000003C0-0x000003DF

Memory Address    0xA0000-0xBFFFF

Driver    c:\windows\system32\drivers\nv4_mini.sys (6.14.11.7519, 6.25 MB (6,557,408 bytes), 8/3/2004 10:29 PM)

I've been doing MalwareByte and SASpyware scans,

here's my Dump File https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=5E9161E0412D6528!164&authkey=!AJ38-Yq\_Q0SoGyY

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Performance and system failures

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

43 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2013-02-12T07:44:37+00:00

    I think that the Windows firewall is adequate for most folks, other firewalls may offer more adjustments and I think the consensus is that you should only run one firewall at a time, so pick the one you feel the best about for your environment and surfing habits and disable others lest they get into an argument.

    A third party firewall installation should be smart enough to disable the XP firewall, but looking in the Comodo forums, it looks like sometimes it doesn't and some of the regular members out there say things like:

    Known and annoying problem.

    It's a well known rule - you shouldn't have more than one firewall running.It is definitely recommended to turn Windows Firewall off as unexpected things may happen that could interfere with your security.

    Of course the Comodo people think their firewall is superior and it may well be, but you may have issues with some of these third party tools if you install them "out of the box" with all their protection things enabled thinking that more protection must be better protection...  then you may find that you have to start tweaking it to get your system to behave, get frustrated trying to get all your stuff working again and then just end up uninstalling it all later.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2013-02-12T02:55:20+00:00

    Thanks for that Elder.

    say, one more question. In my other thread, I forget who it was (Elder, Tech Geek?) said I should remove Comodo firewall due to conflict it might be causing, and instead just use Win firewall, and along with my router I'd be fine. So I'm using Win firewall now.

     I don't have a router, just a modem. Am I still safe using Win firewall by itself?

    I'm using Avast Free for my AV.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2013-02-11T07:52:08+00:00

    If you choose to run the chkdsk with error correction either from Start, Run or from the Tools options and if you want chkdsk to actually try to fix problems, your system must be in a "static state".

    There are only two ways to be sure your system is in a static state when running chkdsk.

    One way is to run chkdsk from the XP Recovery Console so that XP is not "running" to interfere with chkdsk and when it will be impossible for things to be changing on the volume.

    The other way is to schedule the chkdsk to run on the next reboot of the system before XP has a chance to finish loading.

    When you choose to run chkdsk with error correction either from the disk properties Tools options or from Start, Run or a Command Prompt (chkdsk /r) you must respond in the affirmative to this question:

    Would you like this volume to be checked the next time the system restarts?

    If you respond in the affirmative, then chkdsk /r will be scheduled to run the next time XP reboots.

    Running a chkdsk with error correction can take a long time - perhaps many hours depending on the size of the volume, the amount of data on the volume and what chkdsk finds to do.  Be patient and wait observing the percent complete on the screen which may even appear to go backwards sometimes.  If the HDD light is blinking or you can hear the system "working" chkdsk is still running, so do not try to interrupt it.

    When chkdsk runs automatically on a reboot either because XP thinks it needs to (perhaps your NTFS volume has been marked as dirty) or you choose to schedule the chkdsk with error correction on the next reboot, the results are shown in the Event Viewer Application log.  You need to look there for the chkdsk log to see what happened and any problems after chkdsk has run.

    To see the results of a chkdsk that runs on reboot, you must look in the Event Viewer.

    To see the Event Viewer logs, click Start, Settings, Control Panel, Administrative Tools, Event Viewer.

    A shortcut to Event Viewer is to click Start, Run and in the box enter:

    eventvwr.msc

    Click OK to launch the Event Viewer.

    Look in the Application log for an event sourced by Winlogon, something like:

    Event Type:    Information

    Event Source:    Winlogon

    Event Category:    None

    Event ID:    1001

    Description:

    Checking file system on C:

    The type of the file system is NTFS.

    One of your disks needs to be checked for consistency. You may cancel the disk check, but it is strongly recommended that you continue.

    Windows will now check the disk.

    Cleaning up minor inconsistencies on the drive.

    CHKDSK is verifying Usn Journal...

    Usn Journal verification completed.

      39070048 KB total disk space.

      28017948 KB in 100571 files.

         56540 KB in 10556 indexes.

             0 KB in bad sectors.

        236440 KB in use by the system.

         65536 KB occupied by the log file.

      10759120 KB available on disk.

          4096 bytes in each allocation unit.

       9767512 total allocation units on disk.

       2689780 allocation units available on disk.

    Windows has finished checking your disk.

    Please wait while your computer restarts.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2013-02-11T02:02:32+00:00

    So should I do that chkdsc repair in place of my regular chkdsc?

    yeah I think that's why I removed that HD monitor, was taking up too much resource.

    I got Auslogics Disc Defrag, think I'll run that tonite after a disc cleanup!

    say, under C: Properties>Tools, I see Error Checking. Is that like chkdsc? I see boxes for

    automatically fix file sys errors, and another for attempt recovery of bad sectors.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2013-02-11T00:56:04+00:00

    Could you explain how to do a check disk from the Windows environment?

    Would that be Start>Run> chkdsk /r ?

    That would be correct.

    also, do you know of any programs that monitor your hard drive? I seem to remember having one, Hard Drive heath or something.

    There are such software available. However, I cannot comment on which is the best or which is the worst. I don't use such programs. I like the speed of my computer to be as optimal as possible. Perhaps this has something to do with my inability to display patience. In any event, the more programs you have running at start-up the more resources the computer uses ultimately resulting in slower respond times. I try to perform regular back-ups ( I clone/image the hard drive. This way I get all my programs and personal files should the need arise), perform routine maintenance (check disk), run Puran defrag (I use the boot defrag), blow the inside of the computer out once a month (dust causes overheating which is the primary cause of electronic failure for any device) and don't worry about it from there. If something goes out I simply replace it (hard drive included).

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments