What is the BEST Registry Cleaner for Win 7 Ultimate or Pro 64 Bit version OS ?

Anonymous
2011-04-18T13:30:52+00:00

What is the BEST Registry Cleaner for Win 7  Ultimate or Pro  64 Bit version OS ?

When I search the internet  with that same Question ,,  i get  hundreds of links  and every company says it has the 100%  BEST  Registry Cleaner software  and i bet 99%  are liars !!

Microsoft  really  needs to TEST  all Registry cleaners &  make a list of the Top  5 BEST  software  for many different uses and post that list so  your Customers can  know what is the Best to use to Fix  their PC  problems .

Please !!  be Nice  and help your Customers who have bought and use your Microsoft  software ..  OK ??

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Windows update

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

199 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2014-06-18T00:14:52+00:00

    Hi again. You want to put a finger on one Registry Cleaner MS recommend I already mentioned Perfect Regestry which I did Buy. That's one software to much if they say in other place they don´t  recommend that kind of software.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2014-06-17T22:17:09+00:00

    Now suppose MS would have made a registry maintenance tool, and that tool would have been made according to the standards MS wanted, then it would have been impossible for software companies to use the registry in the wrong way. The tool would have removed the erroneous entries from the registry.

    One more reason why MS should have made that tool.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2014-06-17T21:59:21+00:00

    hi you say: "Microsft does not recommend using a Registry cleaner"

    But you recommend Registry software why on earth do you recommend such things but not recommend registry cleaner. There is something wrong there.  Microsoft has recommend a lot of registry software in the past why?

    If MS recommended a lot of registry SW in the past, can you supply *1* URL that shows MS recommending a registry cleaner on any MS operating system in the past 15 years?  Just "1" ... I mean if there was "a lot", you should be able to find 1 URL w/MS recommending it.  If you can't, find even 1, maybe MS hasn't recommended any for quite a while.

    The only think MS used to recommend was something to clean up old office software entries -- BUT with the arrival of Office 2000 -- PARTIAL (looking broken because they point to files that don't exist) registry entries have been used by MS's auto-installer to automatically install pieces of Office Software, *as needed*, so you didn't have to install the whole thing at once.  From that point on, MS stopped recommending any registry cleaners.   The ONLY registry tuning that has been recommended since then is something that dumps and restores the entire registry -- but that hasn't been available or recommended, that I know of, since Vista.  The benefit of doing that (dump / restore) was to compact your registry -- which is of minimal usefulness on today's computers.

    Software publishers don't follow a standard when writing to the registry -- so how can a 3rd party cleaner know what is valid and what is not?

    MS had SW interfaces that imposed standards, but most SW publishers wrote

    their own and wrote directly to the registry in their own format and have been since Win9x.  There has been no way to police such actions -- so there is no way to know what to clean out.  There are no ownership tags nor creation dates in the registry.

    It's like a dumb'ed down 'FAT32' filesystem -- no user info, and no date info -- only

    security descriptors.  The registry doesn't have enough info in it to determine what

    is valid and what is not.

    Your computer sucks due to your poor maintenance and MS's aiding you in keeping it so.  That's why 64-bitOS's by default don't allow you to install your own drivers anymore -- and why some processes on win7 are normally not touchable by you -- MS is trying to create protected parts of the OS to add to stability and security -- and add to the ability to resist tampering and forging/counterfeiting (with rootkit infested versions).  It's slow going, since people still want compatibility, AND because a totally protected OS would make the PC into a "game console" by default (in the sense that you can only run binaries signed by MS)...

    An option -- maybe linux?...  but it is going in a similar direction under corporate pressure.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2014-06-17T21:45:07+00:00

    Well, i dont agree with the people who say that windows dont need one.

    There is a difference between saying Microsoft doesn't recommend one, and that windows doesn't need one.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2014-06-17T12:57:54+00:00

    hi you say: "Microsft does not recommend using a Registry cleaner"

    But you recommend Registry software why on earth do you recommend such things but not recommend registry cleaner. There is something wrong there.  Microsoft has recommend a lot of registry software in the past why? Perfect registry software which I did buy and thanks to the almighty I did backup of my Registry.My computer suck's at the moment because of your stupip recommend and the you say with arrogance: Micorsoft does not recommend registry cleaner.

    Strange.

    Kind regards. Baldvin

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments