Cannot Index/Search text in the "Notes" field of a Contact withn Outlook Classic.

Question

Cannot Index/Search text in the "Notes" field of a Contact withn Outlook Classic.

Guy Beauvais 0

I am using "Microsoft® Outlook® for Microsoft 365 MSO (Version 2605 Build 16.0.20026.20182) 64-bit"

This version of Outlook is not Indexing Text in the "Notes" field of Outlook Contacts.

I have configured the *File-Options-Search-Indexing Options-Modify (and Advanced) dialogues to include "All Mailboxes" (I have 4) and tto Index "Properties and File Contents" (not Properties Only) and I have confirmed that the "OST" and "PST" file types are checked for Indexing.

This should be a basic search ... how can I activate it ???

Guyb

0 comments

Answer recommended by moderator

Guy Beauvais 0

THANK YOU for all of your help and for guiding me to the MSFT Support Link.

I was able to connect with them and the Tech hit the nail on the head immediately … I wanted to share his solution with you so that you would have it in the future.

In summary … Users who use the Outlook Client to access multiple accounts will encounter this problem when they have A Single Profile hosting “Work/Education Accounts” and “Personal Accounts” … The Work/Education Account often prioritizes “Server Indexing Searching” while the Personal Accounts prioritize “Local Searches”

The most efficient solution for most is to use the Outlook Client for the Personal Accounts and “Outlook PWA” (via Browser ???) for the Work Account.

May I recommend that when Troubleshooting Outlook Search Issues one of the opening questions is “Are you using Work/Education Accounts alongside Personal Accounts within Outlook” ???

Here are the highlights of our Chat Transcript …

You said: I hope you can help ... I am [Moderator note: Personally Identifiable Information removed] @ +[Moderator note: Personally Identifiable Information removed] & [[Moderator note: Personally Identifiable Information removed]] I have lost the ability to search "Outlook-Contact-Notes" ... I get NO RESULTS for searches ... until; I ask for "Search Server" then I get results ... but in a poor format ... I want my Quick Search Field to work again and to find Contacts which contain the requested text string in their "Notes" Field ... Please and Thanks

Bot WC said: Thank you! This issue you have typically occurs when Outlook’s search index becomes corrupted, incomplete, or disconnected from Windows Search services, preventing it from properly scanning and returning results. In many cases, it can also be caused by recent updates, profile corruption, disabled indexing of Outlook data files, or conflicts between multiple accounts or data files, which disrupt how Outlook retrieves search results.

What likely happened was that when you added your work account ([******@Company.com]), Outlook changed how search works behind the scenes, Outlook switched search behavior

Bot WC said: Work (Exchange / corporate) accounts often enforce server-side search preference, different indexing rules and modern search pipeline, as a result your personal accounts (Hotmail/Gmail) rely on local Windows indexing. Your work account pushes Outlook toward server-based search. This creates a hybrid conflict, where Local index = incomplete (especially Notes fields) and Server search = works, but ugly + limited formatting

Bot WC said: I understand. It’s more of a design weakness in Outlook Classic search that shows up especially in mixed personal + work setups like yours. Outlook Classic uses two completely different search systems at the same time, Local search and Server search

Local search (Windows Index) Used for: PST/OST files and Personal accounts Fast but Incomplete (especially for Contact Notes)

Bot WC said: 2. Server search (Exchange / work account) Used for: Corporate mailboxes More accurate for some data but slower and not consistent across all accounts

Bot WC said: When you add a work account, Outlook tries to be “smart” and prioritizes server-based search logic, alters indexing behavior and splits search handling between local + server

Bot WC said:

That results in some fields (like Contact Notes) stop appearing in Quick Search and searches become inconsistent across accounts

Bot WC said: You have 2 options for this

OPTION 1 — Keep everything in one profile (what you have now) - Convenient but Search inconsistencies (what you're seeing) - Works fine if: You don’t rely heavily on Contact Notes search

OPTION 2 — Separate profiles (recommended for your case) Profile 1 → Personal accounts Profile 2 → Work account -Benefits: Clean indexing Reliable search (especially Notes) No cross-account interference -Downside: You switch profiles when opening Outlook

-Benefits: Clean indexing Reliable search (especially Notes) No cross-account interference -Downside: You switch profiles when opening Outlook

But here’s the practical workaround

You don’t actually lose convenience if you do this: Keep Outlook Desktop open for Personal then use Outlook Web (browser) for Work: https://outlook.office.com

This is what many professionals do, no profile switching needed and no search conflicts

1.PHASE 1 — Move Work Email to Web (Fix the Conflict)

2.Reset & Fix Your Indexing (clean rebuild)

Bot WC said: When someone combines Personal accounts (Hotmail, Gmail, POP/IMAP) and Work account (Exchange / Microsoft 365), Outlook silently switches into a hybrid search mode. That triggers different indexing rule, and causes Server vs local search conflicts

Additional note based on further testing:

In addition to checking Control Panel > Indexing Options, it may also be useful to check Windows Search exclusions under Settings > Privacy & Security > Searching Windows > Find my files > Excluded folders.
If the folder that contains the Outlook data/cache location is included in Control Panel Indexing Options but is still listed as excluded in Windows Settings, local search/indexing may not behave as expected. Make sure both locations are consistent before rebuilding the index.

Thanks Again ... I hope that helps ... if tyou can turn that into something useful for the forum then i think we can check this as solved ??? (although I am still waiting for the Indexing Rebuild before I can test).

Will report success if I get it :-) :-)
Guyb

0 comments

5 additional answers

Your answer

Answer 1

Guy Beauvais 0

And Lastly LASTLY ... can you please repeat the experiment of "1A1" and "ABC123" using "All Contact Items" as the scope for the search to see if the search still returns accurate results.

I need to know if a standard Outlook Classic Configuration (Like Yours) can succesfully index and serch "Notes" within an Outlook Contact ... this will help me to eliminate some of the responses I'm getting that suggest "Microsoft MAY have removed the ability of Windows Search/Indexing (Outlook Search/Indexing) to Index/Search the "Notes Field" in an Outlook Contact?" ... I find that hard to believe but the evidence thus far is supportive and compelling ... PLEASE & THANKS !!!

Chris Duong 10,705 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator

2026-06-29T23:10:43.8133333+00:00

Hi Guy,

Thank you very much for your detailed update. I’ll review your situation and check if there is anything else we can do. Once I’ve finished testing the information, I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Chris Duong 10,705 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator

2026-06-30T22:52:38.4333333+00:00
Hi Guy,

Thank you very much for your response and for taking the time to share the information you received from Microsoft Support. I really appreciate your patience, your detailed follow-up, and the helpful findings you brought back to the forum.

I have marked your reply as an answer so that other users who run into a similar Outlook search issue can find this information more easily.

For reference, the Outlook version I tested with is Classic Outlook Version 20131.20052, Click-to-Run.

I also repeated the same test using All Contact Items as the search scope in the People/Contacts section. In my test, searching for both “1A1” and “ABC123” under All Contact Items did not return the contact. However, both values were returned successfully when using All Outlook Items.

Because “1A1” is the contact name/File As value, this suggests the issue may not be limited specifically to the Notes field. It may instead be related to how Outlook Classic handles the All Contact Items search scope compared with the broader All Outlook Items scope.

So far, based on my testing, All Outlook Items appears to be the scope that can reliably return the contact, including the text stored in the Notes field. That distinction may help explain why the behavior feels inconsistent depending on which search scope is selected.

Also, your point about asking early whether the profile contains both Work/Education accounts and Personal accounts is very helpful. I agree that this is a useful troubleshooting question for Outlook search issues, especially when local search and server-side search behave differently.

As a forum moderator, I hope you understand that I don’t have the ability to modify Outlook behavior or escalate product issues directly from here. However, I strongly recommend submitting this through the “Provide search feedback to Microsoft” option in Outlook. That is one of the best ways to make sure this behavior is recorded as feedback and can be considered by the product team for future improvements.

I hope this information is helpful. Please feel free to contact if you need anything else.

Thank you again for your patience and for sharing your findings with the community.
Guy Beauvais 0 Reputation points

2026-07-01T13:11:47.8766667+00:00

Thanks Again ... I am in the final stages of a "Full Index Rebuild" ... 56,202 items remianing from >340,000 ... The final Index Build will have taken almost 100 hours to complete. The last thing I discovered while setting the parameters for that "Build" was that there are two ways to identify folders which should be excluded from Indexing and the two do not necessarilly communicate with each other.

Control Panel > Indexing Options > Modify > Change Selelcted Locations > Check/Uncheck Folders for Inclusion/Exclusion from Indexing is one such place to make choices.

Settings > Privacy and Security > Search > Find My Files > Enhanced > Add an excluded folder > is another such place to make the choice to Exclude.

I found that "Checking" a Folder in the Control Panel sequence DID NOT ALWAYS Remove the associated "Add an Excluded Folder" command in the "Settings" Sequence ... so that the Folder set to be Indexed in the Control Panel Selection REMAINED AS EXCLUDED in the Settings selection area.

The solution (I am hoping, pending completion of Index Rebuild of 100 hours mentioned above) is to Manually Remove all "Excluded Folders" from the "Settings/Find my files" area and then double check (and manually add/remove if necessary) entries to both selelction areas ensuring that they are consistent in directing the Search/Indexer where to Index and where NOT TO INDEX.

My OST location was identified differentl;y in the two areas ... Control Panel had it included but the Settings/Find my files area was excluding it ...

Sorry for being so verbose ... and for lingering here longer than you probably expected ... BUT ... I will stay and make a comment after this final "Indexing Build" AND I will make a complete report and submit to the "Provide Search feedback to Microsoft" in hopes of a better future for Indexing and Search in Outlook/Contacts/Notes !!!

It would be good if you could EDIT THE ANSWER to include this additional consideration/examination as part of the Solution or at least Troubleshooting steps.

Guyb
Chris Duong 10,705 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator

2026-07-01T22:47:40.4733333+00:00
Hi Guy,

Thank you very much for your patience while I reviewed the additional information you shared. After looking into your latest findings, I agree that this is a very useful troubleshooting point and I appreciate you taking the time to document it so clearly.

If a folder is included under Control Panel > Indexing Options, but the same folder or related location is still listed as an excluded folder under Settings > Privacy & Security > Searching Windows / Find my files, then the local Windows Search index may not behave as expected.

I would not want to call this the confirmed root cause until your full index rebuild finishes and you can test again, but it is definitely worth checking, especially in a case like this where:

Find More on Server returns the expected result

Advanced Find can locate the contact

but local Quick Search does not return the expected Contact Notes result

That still points toward a local indexing/search behavior issue, and inconsistent include/exclude settings could certainly be part of that.

I’ve updated the answer to include this as an additional troubleshooting step so other users can check it as well.

Please feel free to share the result after the full rebuild completes. Given the size of your index, I agree it is best to let the rebuild finish fully before making any final conclusion.

Thank you again for staying with this and for sharing your findings with the community. This kind of detail can definitely help other users facing similar Outlook search issues.
Guy Beauvais 0 Reputation points

2026-07-04T14:49:09.5233333+00:00

Hello Again ... Everythng in your comment is accurate ... THANK YOU !!!

My Index Rebuid is complete (almost 100 Hours to Index 333,974 Items)

However, every time I "Start-up" and review the Settings > Privacy and Security > Search Window ... It shows that the Indexer is running again and always has between 15,000 - 20,000 "Pending Items". How can there be so may items remaining after a complete Indexing ... AND ... even when those thousands of items are Indexed and the systems shows "0 pending" the "Indexed Items" number has increased - but not by the same number (usually less than 10% of "Pending Items").

But the real confusion starts here ... Many Contact Items DO RESPOND to a "Quick Search" for text which exists only in their "Notes" (Body??) field ... and many do NOT ... I cannot find the distinguising factor that makes the difference.

And ... While I can view all of the other "Fields" by opening a contact and the changing the view to "Show" and selelcting Categories/Groups of Fields such as "All Note Fields" ... no where is there a field that is titles "Notes" or "Body" (some say it is actually "Body") that contains the text that I see in the "Notes" box within the Contact ... Where is that text stored ???

Still investigating ... and hoping that somehow the Quick Search will magically start working again.
Chris Duong 10,705 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator

2026-07-07T21:24:31.7966667+00:00
Hi Guy,

Thank you for the update, and I’m glad to hear the full index rebuild has completed after such a long run. I also appreciate you continuing to document the behavior so clearly.

The pending item count you are seeing in Windows Search does not always translate one-to-one into the final indexed item count. Some items may be scanned, skipped, merged, treated as duplicates, inaccessible, or not indexed as separate searchable items. That said, if Windows Search repeatedly returns to 15,000-20,000 pending items after startup, that may still suggest something is continuing to trigger re-indexing or that one of the indexed locations is not being processed consistently.

The most interesting part of your latest finding is that some contacts can be found by Quick Search using text that exists only in the Notes area, while others cannot. That suggests the issue may not be a complete loss of Notes search capability. It may be more related to differences between contact items, folders, accounts, data stores, or how certain contact records were created or synced.

For the contacts that work versus the contacts that do not, it may be helpful to compare a few examples side by side and check whether there is any pattern, such as:

whether they are stored under the same account

whether they are in the same Contacts folder

whether they belong to a personal account or a work/education account

whether they are stored in the same PST/OST data file

whether they were newly created, imported, migrated, or synced

whether the Notes content is plain text or copied from another source

Regarding where the Notes text is stored, the large Notes area in an Outlook contact may not appear as a simple field named “Notes” in every field view. In many Outlook contexts, that content is treated more like the contact item’s body/notes content, which may explain why it is visible in the contact form but not shown as a regular field named “Notes” or “Body” in the field list.

At this stage, since Quick Search works for some Contact Notes but not others, the key may be identifying what separates the working contacts from the non-working ones. If no clear pattern appears, I would recommend sharing this latest finding with Microsoft Support as well, since it may help them investigate whether this is related to local indexing, contact item format, account/profile configuration, or different data stores.

Thank you again for continuing to share your findings.

Answer 2

Guy Beauvais 0

And lastly ... very early in our discussions yoou created a Conact "1A1" and inserted "ABC123" into the notes field ... you were able to find this text/contact using the standard Outlook Quick Search ... Can you please tell me what verion of Outlook you are using ???

0 comments

Answer 3

Guy Beauvais 0

Wow ... OK ... I thought I was already doing that ... must have slipped ... anyway ...

When I choose "All Contact Items" I get the same response of "No Results" ... BUT when I change to "All Outlook Items" ... I get the same response of "No Results" AND an added link for "Find More On Server" - which - when clicked - delivers the right answer of 1 Contact and One Email Thread (this one) ...

Does that make any sense ???

Does that mean that the OST on the Server (which I assume is the Exchange Server responsible for "Hotmail Accounts") is indexed but not the OST on my OneDrive (Where Outlook stores its OST) or the OST on my local disc (because I keep the OST file available offline at all times) ???

The Advanced Find works as you described ... but that is a lot of work to make a simple search ... surely the Fast Search should work on the Notes Field ...

I appreciate your help ...and the speed with which you are moving ... I finally feel like someone is helping and that they have the ability to resolve this ... THANK YOU !!!

Chris Duong 10,705 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator

2026-06-26T22:16:58.4333333+00:00
Hi Guy,

Thank you for testing that and for sharing the results. I also truly appreciate your kind words and the time and effort you put into testing this and providing such clear details.

What you are seeing does make sense, and it actually helps narrow down the issue further.

The fact that Find More on Server returns the correct contact suggests that the item and the Notes content are searchable from the server side. Also, since Advanced Find works when searching the Notes field, that further confirms that the Notes field itself can be queried.

There is not an “OST on the server.” The OST file is the local offline cache stored on your device. The mailbox data itself is stored on the mail server. So, when Outlook does not return the result locally but does return it after clicking Find More on Server, this points more toward a local Outlook Instant Search / Windows Search indexing / cached OST behavior issue rather than the Notes field being completely unsearchable.

I agree that for a normal user experience, the fast search should ideally return this result without requiring Advanced Find or Find More on Server. Since the issue now appears to be specific to local Outlook/Windows Search behavior, this may require deeper investigation of your Outlook profile, local index, OST cache, or build-specific behavior.

At this point, the most appropriate next step is to have your IT administrator open a Microsoft Support ticket through the Microsoft 365 Admin Center. Please include this key finding:

Searching “ABC123” under All Outlook Items returns no local result, but clicking “Find More on Server” does return the correct contact. Advanced Find using Notes contains ABC123 also returns the contact.

That distinction should help the support team investigate the local search/indexing behavior more efficiently.

As a short-term workaround, you can use either:

All Outlook Items > Find More on Server, or

Advanced Find > Notes contains [keyword]

Additionally, if you’re using a Personal account, you can reach out to Microsoft Support through this link: Contact Us - Microsoft Support

I hope this helps. If there is anything else you need me to check, please let me know.

Thank you again for your patience and for continuing to test this so clearly.

Wishing you all the best.

Answer 4

Guy Beauvais 0

Thank You Chris,

A detailed and exhaustive explanation ... However ... No Joy !!!
I have done all of those things ... some of them several times ... and NO change in the behavious of Windows/Outlook Search.

I feel confident that the "Notes" field is not being "Indexed" ...

Please try this simple experient on your own Outlook System ... Under 5 minutes from start to finish

Create a New Contact "1A1" as surname and "File As"
No other data within the Contact card Fields ... except ... "ABC123" in the Notes Field.
Allow some time for the Indexing Engine to find and index this new Contact (90 seconds is usually enough)
Search for 1A1 ... you shoudl find a single contact ... therefore the item has been found and indexed by Windows Search
Search for "ABC123" ... and report your results here please ... If we both suffer the same results (No Results) then this is not about configuration but about a Regression in Outlook Features and loss of a Critical Feature.

The real question I have for this forum (I am a Newbie) is: Do we have the ears of anyone at MSFT that can address this shortsighted decision/change and have it reversed ???

Please and Thanks

Guyb

Chris Duong 10,705 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator

2026-06-26T18:28:28.55+00:00
Hi Guy,

Thank you very much for the clear repro steps. I tried the same test on my side in Outlook Classic.

When I searched for “ABC123” with the search scope set to All Outlook Items, Outlook returned the contact successfully, and the “ABC123” value in the Notes field was highlighted in the contact preview.

One important detail I noticed is the search scope. In my test, the result was returned when the scope was set to All Outlook Items. Other scopes, such as Current Folder, Current Mailbox, or All Mailboxes, may not return the same result consistently for Contact Notes.

Also, I tested this with Advanced Find as well by setting the value to “ABC123,” and it successfully returned the contact “1A1.” Please see the result below for reference.

Could you please try the same test again and make sure the search scope is set specifically to All Outlook Items

Then search for “ABC123” again.

In case the contact is returned under All Outlook Items, then the issue may be related to Outlook search scope behavior rather than the Notes field not being indexed at all.

Should the contact still does not appear even under All Outlook Items, then this may point to a deeper local indexing, Outlook profile, data file, or build-specific issue. Since this is a user-to-user community forum, I do not have direct access to your environment or a formal escalation path to the Outlook product team from here.

While Microsoft may review community feedback, the most effective way to have this investigated is to ask your IT administrator to open a Microsoft Support ticket through the Microsoft 365 Admin Center. That will allow the appropriate support team to collect logs, validate the behavior, and escalate internally if this is confirmed to be a product issue or regression.

You may also refer to Get support - Microsoft 365 admin | Microsoft Learn

When you reach out, please share the steps you tried and the results, as this will help the support team investigate the issue more efficiently.

Thank you again for your patience and for providing such a helpful test case. Please contact me if you need anything else.