Why is our published Outlook calendar showing as 1899 in our website

Anonymous
2025-02-10T15:23:10+00:00

Our outlook calendar looks fine in outlook but the shared link (html) that we use on our website is showing the calendar as 1899. We have not made any changes to our website so can only assume Microsoft has made some kind of update that has caused this?. How do we rectify or get Microsoft to resolve the issue?

If you click on Today then that takes you to the view that users should be seeing but obviously our users will not know to do that (and why should they)

Just to add to this, if you copy the shared html link from outlook and paste into the browser, the issue is replicated without going via our website so the issue looks likely to be a Microsoft Outlook one?

Microsoft 365 and Office | Install, redeem, activate | For home | Other

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

53 answers

Sort by: Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2025-02-11T20:12:04+00:00

    I contacted MS support yesterday and was told engineers are aware of the issue and working on global fix. Not an issue that can be troubleshooted on local PCs. They asked me to do a developer log run on the published calendar and was uploaded for engineer's review.

    Was this answer helpful?

    7 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2025-02-14T16:21:29+00:00

    Any updates from MS engineers?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2025-02-15T10:39:29+00:00

    We also faced the same issue for our shared calendar.

    Any updates so far on this topic from MS?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2025-02-16T12:47:34+00:00

    Anybody heard anything more on this, 7+ days seems a ridiculously long time for this issue to still be ongoing?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2025-02-16T17:24:01+00:00

    Same issue still happening as of 2/16/2025. Regardless of the publish link used, the initial date is from 1899.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments