Loops components with external users

Anonymous
2023-03-22T22:44:18+00:00

Hello, is it possible to configure tenant to allow loop components to be shared with users external to the org ?

thanks

Microsoft 365 and Office | Loop | Other
Microsoft 365 and Office | Loop | Other

A collaborative workspace app in Microsoft 365 designed to help teams co-create, stay organized, and work together in real time across apps and devices.

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments

75 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2023-05-24T00:53:10+00:00

    any update on this ? (or timeframe)

    it almost makes the product useless without the ability to share externally

    Was this answer helpful?

    40+ people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  2. Anonymous
    2023-04-23T13:54:44+00:00

    I wish I'd found this post yesterday. I've spent the entire day troubleshooting the fact I can't share with an external user. All the documentation suggests it's possible. Better documentation, or a big red warning, would have been more professional.

    Mark

    Was this answer helpful?

    40+ people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  3. Anonymous
    2023-03-26T17:26:34+00:00

    Hi Gianfranco, not at this time. This is in our backlog though to allow for easier collaboration across companies/tenants.

    Was this answer helpful?

    20+ people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  4. Anonymous
    2023-06-21T08:27:25+00:00

    I am about to abandon Loop for OneNote.
    Inability to share externally in Loop invalidates all the other features, at least in our use.

    Was this answer helpful?

    10+ people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  5. Anonymous
    2023-05-24T06:42:19+00:00

    any update on this ? (or timeframe)

    it almost makes the product useless without the ability to share externally

    Agreed. This should have been a priority.

    Was this answer helpful?

    10+ people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments