GREAT thread here. Let's take this up a notch.... :-) . So first, some “cloud storage 101” basics….
I think this boils down basically to using a block storage versus object storage system, doesn't it? All of the free cloud storage systems, that general consumers
are aware of, are "object storage" systems (Box, Dropbox, One Drive, Google Drive,...). When a change is made to the "object" the entire object (in this case a pst file) must be re-written, not just the part you change inside the file. Object storage is GREAT
for storing things that don't change much if ever (photo's, music, etc).
Block storage on the other hand, provides fixed-sized raw storage capacity. Each storage volume can be treated as an independent disk drive and controlled by
an external server operating system. This block device can be mounted by the guest operating system as if it were a physical disk and is usually pretty good for databases and things in which a file is “opened” and only part of it is modified when a change
is made.
However, Amazon AWS offers a free tier of block storage in their S3 and EBS services (at least for a year?). S3 offers 5GB free and EBS offers 30GB free (you
do need to provide a credit card to sign up). The only problem with block storage service is that you need to connect it to a virtual server within the cloud providers network which is not free (please correct me on this if someone is otherwise aware). The
good news is that the storage is persistent and does not go away or get erased when it is not connected to a virtual server. I did price out the cheapest 24x7 virtual server at $0.015/hour, or basically $10.95 a month if you left it up and running non-stop.
It would be significantly less than that if it was used a few hours a day, along with the storage. The service may start charging for the storage after year 1 as well.
So my question is, is it reasonably feasible to use an Amazon, Microsoft Azure, Google Compute block storage service to permanently load your PST
files on, and use them remotely from multiple PC’s (albeit one at a time)? It still remains a discussion as to whether this would make sense cost-wise.