The true will you free.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument
The standard was developed by a technical committee in the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) consortium.[3] It was based on the Sun Microsystems specification for OpenOffice.org XML, the default format for OpenOffice.org,
which had been specifically intended "to provide an open standard for office documents."[4]
Initial release
1 May 2005; 9 years ago
OpenDocument 1.3 (a.k.a. "ODF-Next") As of January, 2014, the current state of a possible future version of OpenDocument specification is a working draft (a preliminary unapproved sketch, outline, or version of the specification). The OASIS Advanced Document
Collaboration subcommittee (created in December, 2010) is working on an update of OpenDocument change-tracking that will not only enhance the existing change-tracking feature set, but also lay the foundation for the standardization of real-time collaboration
by making change tracking compatible with real-time collaboration.[27][28][29]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office\_Open\_XML
Office Open XML (also informally known as OOXML or OpenXML) is a zipped, XML-based file format developed by Microsoft[2] for representing spreadsheets, charts, presentations and word processing documents. The format was initially standardised by Ecma (as
ECMA-376) and, in later versions, by ISO and IEC (as ISO/IEC 29500).
Initial release
7 December 2006; 7 years ago
The ISO standardization of Office Open XML was controversial and embittered,[18] with much discussion both about the specification and about the standardization process.[19] According to InfoWorld:
OOXML was opposed by many on grounds it was unneeded, as software makers could use OpenDocument Format (ODF), a less complicated office software format that was already an international standard.[18]
— InfoWorld
The same InfoWorld article reported that IBM (which supports the ODF format) threatened to leave standards bodies that it said allow dominant corporations like Microsoft to wield undue influence. The article further says that Microsoft was accused of co-opting
the standardization process by leaning on countries to ensure that it got enough votes at the ISO for Office Open XML to pass; although it does not specify exactly who accused Microsoft.[18]