Timothy2-11, very well recapitulated.
I now rely much more on my much older and less powerful work PC to edit my Publisher files than my 6-core (8Gb 1866 ram, r9 270x) home PC because the older computer has 2010 and my home computer has 2013.
I have contacted Microsoft support at least twice about this issue. The individuals I have spoken to were helpful and polite, but always incapable of solving this problem. In one series of communications, the operator even claimed to attempt to replicate
the issue on their system but could not confirm the same problems.
This operator has also remote operated my PC but I do not think he conclusively proved or solved anything with that attempt either.
My partner works in publishing and has scoffed at my use of Microsoft Publisher for professional applications in the past. I am a research scientist and have happily used Publisher 2010 for many years to edit and compose camera and microscope images for
my personal records and for public presentations. It was my experience with Publisher 2013 that has caused me to reconsider my partner's advice and to rethink my use of Microsoft editing and compositional software for professional uses.
My recollection of conversing with Microsoft support was that the operators found it hard to comprehend that a user could be regularly managing documents consisting of tens to hundreds of very high resolution images with annotations. These images are, of
course, overkill for printing and 'publishing' purposes, but perhaps it should be considered that some people may wish to edit, compose, and store original resolution images in the Publisher work space before flattening and compressing for publication?
Anyway, I am not sure I have added too much to this thread except, perhaps, another voice for (hopefully) Microsoft developers to hear.