Scott, your "you're misquoting me" rhetoric is getting a bit tedious, and also hypocritical.
You said yourself "Not sure about the world you are in but in Microsoft's world (and mine as well) a Knowledge worker is one who's primary job is not IT related."
That's what I suggested might not be right, and yes, you made it clear that you
did agree with them on that. In fact it's been you main point in this thread.
Did I say that the Access security model was "very secure"? No, just powerful.
For someone who claims to be "normally very precise in ... use of the English language" you're not being very precise here either - where, exactly did I "attack MVPs in general"?
Let me be clear: I am criticising (not attacking) your input here, not MVPs in general.
I think you do not understand the philosophy behind the product as well as you claim. You have repeatedly stressed that Access has an "end user" focus, and always has, and tried to use the argument of authority to back that up when the evidence clearly shows
that the product also has a rich history as a development platform too. It's not either/or, it's both. It always has been, although I accept that since 2003 the product has been dumbed down, which brings us back to the topic in question - why remove Pivot
Tables because it's an "end user" tool (your argument, remember) when it's not been removed from Excel (an even more end user focused tool)?