How can I include the postal barcode on envelopes I print?

Anonymous
2010-08-19T21:58:15+00:00

I've been using word for years.  I occassionally print envelopes including the postal barcode.  I haven't figured it out yet in office 2010.  I hope that some one can help me.  Thanks in advance.

Lee Warren

Microsoft 365 and Office | Word | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Anonymous
2012-01-13T23:40:07+00:00

As explained in  http://support.microsoft.com/kb/897290 the POSTNET barcode that Word can create is now obsolete, so it was removed from the Envelope dialog starting in Word 2007.

If you really want to put in a POSTNET barcode, you can go to Insert > Quick Parts > Field and insert a BarCode field (which is how the option in the Envelopes dialog used to do its work). The syntax

of the field code is explained here:

http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/word-help/field-codes-barcode-field-HP005186205.aspx


Jay Freedman

MS Word MVP  FAQ: http://word.mvps.org

Hello everyone!   I too was very frustrated by this.  When I used the "add field" under the quick parts menu in Word 2010 and added "barcode", I would always get "Invalid Zip" as the response.  After some investigating, I found the fix:  if you go to the USPS website at https://ribbs.usps.gov/onecodesolution/download.cfm and download uspsEncoderMsOffice-1.3.0.zip, you can install it in seconds.

Once you install, all you have to do is the following: I went back to the "mailings" menu, selected "envelopes", then went to the address field and clicked "insert", then clicked "quick parts", selected "bar code" and clicked "is US address" and entered the zip code.  This worked perfectly for me in Word 2010. 

Hope this helps!!

Was this answer helpful?

9 people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Anonymous
2013-10-30T10:58:10+00:00

The download you want for a 64-bit Windows system running 32-bit Office software is uspsEncoderMsOffice-1.3.1.  Looks similar except the MsOffice part.

The solution referenced requires more operator intervention than I would like each time one wishes to insert a bar code on an envelope.  Hopefully, that will be a fix in the future.

Was this answer helpful?

3 people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Jay Freedman 208.3K Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
2010-08-20T01:37:37+00:00

As explained in  http://support.microsoft.com/kb/897290 the POSTNET barcode that Word can create is now obsolete, so it was removed from the Envelope dialog starting in Word 2007.

If you really want to put in a POSTNET barcode, you can go to Insert > Quick Parts > Field and insert a BarCode field (which is how the option in the Envelopes dialog used to do its work). The syntax

of the field code is explained here:

http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/word-help/field-codes-barcode-field-HP005186205.aspx


Jay Freedman

MS Word MVP  FAQ: http://word.mvps.org

Was this answer helpful?

0 comments No comments

41 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2017-04-10T01:28:39+00:00

    I too used to print the POSTNET barcodes as a way of making sure that my postal mail was machine sorted.  And I have read through the discussion and yes it is possible to still print the old POSTNET barcodes using Word 2016 if you install the USPS download mentioned. (I've done it for fun)

    I think it is unlikely that using the old codes is a problem for USPS since during the switchover from POSTNET to the new codes there would have been millions of pieces of junk mail in the system and hand addressing it would have been out of the question.  It would have been easy to write the scanning software to read both codes and just ignore the obsolete code.   The few times I've ever gotten a letter that had a stickered barcode on it there had never been a barcode on the letter in the first place.

    But clearly the old barcode is useless and does nothing if added.  However - there is STILL something that you can do to make sure that your mail is machine-scanned and not hand-scanned, and that is to put the proper address formatting on the envelope.  That is detailed here:

    http://about.usps.com/publications/pub177/welcome.htm

    The critical things are to use 10 or 12 point font that is OCR-readable.  USPS uses Ariel font on their website but this is NOT a good OCR font because the l and I are the same (lowercase L and uppercase I)   The Tahoma font has been discovered to be very friendly to OCR as detailed here:

    https://www.capturebites.com/2016/03/15/ocr-font/

    It also would not hurt to bold it depending on how good the contrast is - bold black on white envelope is the best of course.  And of course, use all upper case.

    The other critical thing is to put the city, state and zip on the same line and use the proper zip +4.   Get this from the USPS zip lookup page here:

    https://tools.usps.com/go/ZipLookupAction!input.action

    For example here is the RIGHT way to do it:

    MICROSOFT

    1 MICROSOFT WAY

    REDMOND WA 98052-8300

    And here is the WRONG way to do it:

    Microsoft

    One Microsoft Way

    Redmond WA

    98052

    Both will arrive but the second one will likely require hand sorting.

    And of course it goes without saying that if you hand-write the address, or use any color other than black, it's going to be hand-sorted.

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2012-07-30T21:26:56+00:00

    Um, Jay, can you read subtext?  Clearly your jargon filled answers frustrated those of us who liked the simple box that we checked in previous editions of Word. Also, Doug Robbins' assumption that we used it merely for a postal discount also appeared to dismiss our appeals for assistance.  Note that "Found the Answer!!";s answer stopped the queries.  I'll admit that we frustrated you, but the feeling clearly was mutual.

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments