Settings: Junk Mail: Blocked Senders: Domain Gostarmedia.com & *@gostsarmedia.com do not block incoming spam

Anonymous
2025-06-13T16:49:06+00:00

For at least two weeks, I've been inundated with spam from the domain gostarmedia.com. I've created the following "solutions" all without success.

Rules

Sender Address Includes "gostarmedia" (without quotes)

Categorize as Spam

Move to Junk Email

Junk Mail

*@gostarmedia.com

gostarmedia.com

It would be really great if Hotmail could stop letting ****clowns like these from getting through if someone enters a valid domain. That or allow more wildcards (e.g. *@*.gostarmedia.com), instead of only allowing it in place of usernames preceding the @.

Today, I searched and deleted 16 out of 18 Junk Mail emails, that had the gostarmedia.com domain in their addresses.

Thanks!

-User since 1995

Outlook | Web | Outlook.com | Email

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

167 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2025-06-19T18:44:20+00:00

    Just wanted to comment and say I am having this same exact issue! I set up a rule to delete all the messages coming from the gostarmedia.com domain but that only works on the inbox folder. I wish the email rules would also work on the Junk folder.

    Was this answer helpful?

    7 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2025-06-26T12:57:03+00:00

    Here is a thought - since "gostarmedia.com" is a KNOWN spammer even to the genius team at Outlook, and ALL outlook users are being overwhelmed by this spammer's domain (I have been averaging over 70 emails daily all from gostarmedia.com) and since the good people at Outlook supposedly actually care about the customer experience (or possibly they want us all to migrate to Gmail since amazingly Gmail does NOT have this issue with spammers), and since spamming is definitely illegal in the Outlook world terms of use, then WHY doesn't Outlook simply fully block anything from gostarmedia.com - doesn't matter what they put in front of their domain name as none of it is legit - no need to even deliver to junk folder just block it?

    Would truly love to hear from the actual leader of Outlook email delivery to understand the reason why Outlook loves to deliver blatantly malicious spam to their customers and is so inept at protecting their customers email folders.

    Was this answer helpful?

    6 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2025-06-19T17:33:44+00:00

    appreciate your efforts and was not trying to argue about your workaround solution.

    It's just that Microsoft needs to fix the .gostarmedia.com issue and not leave it to users to find a workaround

    MICROSOFT: once and for all fix the .gostarmedia.com spamming problem now!!!!!

    Was this answer helpful?

    6 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2025-06-14T13:08:58+00:00

    Dear user,

    Welcome to Microsoft Community.

    We understand your frustration with being inundated by spam from the gostarmedia.com domain, and that your attempts to set up rules and blocked senders have not been successful. Thank you for detailing the steps you've already taken, which helps us better understand the issue you're facing.

    The situation you're experiencing is a common tactic used by spammers, who frequently change subdomains or forge sender information to circumvent blocking rules. Although you've set up blocking rules for @gostarmedia.com and gostarmedia.com, the spam still gets through, which might indicate that the senders are using variations or that these emails are being marked as "not junk" before reaching your inbox.

    Here are some more in-depth suggestions and possible explanations:

    1. Regarding Wildcards and Domain Blocking Limitations: Your suggestion about wildcards (*@*.gostarmedia.com) is indeed very valuable, and many users would appreciate more flexible blocking options. Currently, Outlook.com's "Blocked Senders" feature primarily targets complete email addresses or top-level domains (like gostarmedia.com). For more complex subdomain variations, a simple domain block might not be enough to cover all cases.
    2. Review Your Existing Rules: While you've set up rules to categorize emails containing "gostarmedia" as spam and move them to the Junk Email folder, spammers sometimes use clever methods to bypass these rules, such as using terms in the subject or body that don't directly match, or sending from seemingly unrelated addresses that then reference the domain in the content.
      • Please double-check your rules to ensure they use "Sender address includes" instead of "Sender address equals".
      • Make sure this rule has a higher priority (i.e., it's placed higher in the list) so it's processed before other rules.
      • Consider adding more conditions, for example, if the email subject or body also contains "gostarmedia," then treat it as spam.
    3. Utilize the "Mark as Junk" Feature for Training: You've been manually deleting these emails, but a more effective approach is to mark them as junk instead of just deleting them. When you mark an email as junk, you are "training" Outlook's spam filter. The system learns the characteristics of these emails and will be better at identifying and blocking similar emails in the future.
      • In your inbox or any folder, select the emails from gostarmedia.com and then click the "Junk" button at the top.
      • Even if they are already in the Junk Email folder, you can mark them as "Phishing" or "Junk" to further reinforce the filter's learning.
    4. Check Your "Safe Senders" List: Confirm that gostarmedia.com or any related addresses have not been mistakenly added to your "Safe Senders" list. If they are on the safe list, these emails will be allowed through even if you have blocking rules in place.
      • Go to Outlook.com Settings > Mail > Junk email.
      • Check the "Safe senders and domains" and "Safe mailing lists" sections.
    5. Beware of Sender Spoofing: You mentioned that the emails might not have been sent from your account, which suggests the possibility of sender spoofing. In such cases, even if you block a specific domain, attackers can bypass filters by forging sender information. Microsoft 365 has robust anti-spam capabilities, but highly spoofed emails can sometimes still slip through. Continuously marking them as junk is key to improving identification rates.

    We understand your desire for Hotmail to more effectively block this spam. Microsoft's anti-spam team is continuously working to improve its filtering algorithms. Your feedback is crucial for these improvements.

    Please try the suggestions above and persist in marking these emails as junk. Over time, Outlook's filters will become smarter at identifying and blocking spam from gostarmedia.com.

    Most sincerely,

    Henry-N - MSFT | Microsoft Community Support Specialist

    Was this answer helpful?

    6 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2025-06-17T12:39:33+00:00
    1. Regarding Wildcards and Domain Blocking Limitations: Your suggestion about wildcards (*@*.gostarmedia.com) is indeed very valuable, and many users would appreciate more flexible blocking options. Currently, Outlook.com's "Blocked Senders" feature primarily targets complete email addresses or top-level domains (like gostarmedia.com). For more complex subdomain variations, a simple domain block might not be enough to cover all cases.

    Please... How do we add wildcards to these domains? How do we block these emails?!

    [![](https://learn-attachment.microsoft.com/api/attachments/2f23d473-e9c7-4625-813b-842e18f549d0?platform=QnA "filestore.community.support.microsoft.com")
    
    [![](https://learn-attachment.microsoft.com/api/attachments/949b8be6-9bdc-4594-a8ab-1975792c97cd?platform=QnA "filestore.community.support.microsoft.com")
    

    Was this answer helpful?

    5 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments