I respectfully disagree 100% with Lyndon here.
Change is expensive. But sunk cost is a fallacy. The fact that a change has resulted is such a backlash should be heard by Microsoft.
A data point of one person saying they are bad is a subjective opinion. A preponderance of similar opinions, even if they are "vitriol" or negative, has merit for any company who provides products or services. We are not subjects, we are customers. Our opinions should matter.
I agree that Microsoft should listen to our feedback. Many on this thread would seem to disagree that Microsoft does listen to our feedback. Perhaps I'm excessively cynical, but I'm finding myself tempted to agree.
I realize this may seem a subtle point, but "we like Teams but hate the emojis" is exactly the message we are trying to convey to Microsoft Teams' product folks. And, let's be clear, hate is the correct term. Moderate dislike does not result in this kind of feedback. Someone truly messed up at Microsoft and we need to keep making them constantly aware until this changes.
I'm willing to hear an argument in favor of persistence. Do you think it will help?
This should not be a personalization option (ie., I get to choose "classic emojis" but others may choose the new ones). That means I can't rely on what I'm communicating reaching the other person in the same way as intended. No. This needs to be a 100% U turn away from these monstrosities.
Excellent point.