My newsfeed is, on any given day, 20%+ filled with tremendously biased articles about "gender identity." MSN literally blocked the words "biology" and "DSM-13," (BOTH words that are very germane to the conversation) in the comments. On an article that falsely claimed that the side-effects of gender transition were in youth were "mild", the word "sterilization" (one the most egregious proven side-effects) was banned as well as the phrase "side-effect" (!!!) when paired with "gender affirming care." Why would that be???
An article panning Ivermectin as strictly a veterinary drug and making thinly vailed implications that the drug is detrimental for human use (the Nobel Prize in 2015 was awarded as a result of the use of Ivermectin as a worldwide life-saving treatment in cases of malaria), the word "vaccine" was restricted in the comments. Why would that be???
It's quite clear that "certain comments" are being restricted along ideological lines on topics that should be defined by robust discourse, not censorship. It's preposterous to reply with an invitation for feedback when the standards applied to the comment sections under MSN articles are sweeping and obviously working as MSN intended. The algorithm restricts and weeds out cogent rebuttals to hot button social and political topics.
Fix the algorithm to allow for the free exchange of ideas.
Sorry but you aren't communicating with MSN here. No one here can tell you why a comment was blocked.
No one here can "Fix the algorithm."
Here's the relevant part of my canned response on moderation. Please see, in particular, point 4.
4. Moderation is a dysfunctional mess. It's being done via AI, via a bot, not
humans and is random and inexplicable.
Don