It took me a year/so too to make my first system image backup. Some do say Windows Backup & Restore is unreliable. But it always makes images of my 40 GB/so used space in about 15 minutes, & that one time I needed to restore one was just as quick. Also, it fills the Previous Versions tab of a file/folders' Properties so that the image not even need be mounted to recover a stray file. But I'm sure your 3rd-party app can also retrieve individual files & is quicker & makes more compact images. Wow, I don't understand it took hours for you (& then a crash) unless you had it also image your separate data drive & that one is enormous. It does sound as if you are better off with AOMEI. I must admit, at every new Windows version (not OS Build) I also make a second image using Seagate's free DiscWizard. I've heard good things about Apple's Time Machine before. Very nice.
Hi PCR,
I've been using Windows Image Backup for years and it still works fine, I use it every week after an update with a new insider build and I can restore a working system very easily if there is any issue.
My system in every machine is on SSD which is used only for the Windows system and the installed programs, all my data is on a separate internal HDD, which I can also use to save Windows Image Backup if I don't want to connect an external drive.
MS screwed up the recent default layout of the disks for Legacy Bios when they decided to assign only 50MB to the System Reserved Partition on a clean windows install, that prevents the backup from working because it needs 50MB of free space to do the shadow image.
That problem can be easily eliminated by preformatting the partitions correctly to avoid that specific bug.
With the UEFI layout everything still works correctly with the default partitions created by a clean install.
I also use Macrium if I want to clone the system disk, but usually I'm quite happy with the MS Image Backup.
I just hope they don't drop it or deprecate it as they often keep saying.