I wish I could publish this where it would make a difference, but alas, I'm only a customer.
Windows Bullet Edition
Microsoft has made billionaires of a few people and millionaires of many, mostly because of its business model that in the early days put all of its competitors out of business as a rapidly as possible. But, more in recent times
because it forced and continues to force its customers to continually upgrade their computers and buy more Microsoft products. The new business model of leasing software is a real boon to Microsoft's bottom line as is its cloud computing where it basically
holds the world's data hostage.
As the software evolved into windows-based software, the coding became more and more complex until now it is pretty much unmanageable. Most upgrades cause untold headaches for IT staff around the world. A new feature here and there
always breaks something else.
If Microsoft were any other product, it would long ago have gone bankrupt because of lawsuits and punitive judgments. Microsoft has caused trillions of hours of wasted time for individuals and companies who have to fix software
that breaks something or other.
If I were a judge and had to pass sentence on Microsoft, I would propose this punishment.
Force Microsoft to develop a Bullet Version of Windows. That is a bullet-proof version that is guaranteed not to break and provides all of the features that people actually need and want. The Bullet version would have to work on
all existing windows operating system computers.
If the inevitable were to happen, that is if something did break, Microsoft would be required to provide a fix within 24 hours and would be required to reimburse companies and individuals for their time and effort in resolving the
problem at the current wage for advanced IT staff. They would be required to provide that reimbursement within two weeks of the breakage.
If I were the judge in such a case, I would require that Microsoft reduce its legal staff to less than ten top-notch lawyers and that arbitration be a required avenue of addressing legal issues. The arbitrators would have to be
outside of the purview of the Microsoft company.