What do you mean "it works"?
That the problem did never occur again since I applied the fix.
How many days have passed before you reached this conclusion?
Five, in which the computer has been restarted at least 20 times, without this issue ever occurring again, whereas it occurred regularly every second boot before I applied the fix.
Many of the supposed 'fixes' for this problem seem to work initially but problem returns, sometimes soon afterwards, sometimes days later.
When a 'fix' makes a systematic fault disappear for an observation time much longer than the recurring period of the fault, I observe that the behaviour of the system has positively changed and I call the fix a fix, not a 'fix'. Then, there are two possibilities:
- either the trouble has only become more rare (say from every second boot to every 50th boot): in that case you're right, it was not a fix, just a palliative. Still worth thanks and kudos from me.
- or the trouble disappears, then - after a while - it appears again as it was originally. In that case chances are that something has occurred (or re-occurred) that triggers the problem, rather than 'the fix having not fixed'.
I and a several others have already tried this fix with the sign-in options WEEKS AGO and it has not fixed it by any means.
I'm so sorry for you.
A fix would have to apply to ALL people who have tried it, not just those for whom it seems to work temporarily.
A fix is a fix when it fixes. This thread was opened by myself. I wrote about
my problem, and if my problem gets solved, I write that it is solved. You're free to open a thread about your own problem, which may look very similar but require a different handling in your case. I assume that there are enough differently configured
computers in the world to allow for some fixes to be effective for some cases and not for others. If you were a doctor, you wouldn't cure all people that sneeze using the same medicine, would you?
Also, all is "temporary". Nobody cares about a fix on Windows 95 today. Windows updates introduce bugs that immediately complicate people's lives and getting help
soon is very important. Marking
soon as effective a fix that worked for me may help other people (for which it may be effective too) to find this fix
soon. Yet, as you see, I did test it for a reasonable time span.
And finally: according to your statement, who would be entitled to mark a problem as "solved", exactly? And when?
Whomever marked this as answered jumped the gun or does not seem to know much about the issue. This supposed fix is weeks old and it does not work for me and many others.
I did. Sorry, I'm almost sure the question I answered was "did this resolve your issue?", not "did this resolve amuzeini's and the rest of the world's issue?" I will read more carefully next time.