Vista: The update does not apply to your system

Anonymous
2017-01-23T12:54:10+00:00

This follows on from the Windows Update problem in Vista and 7 (see here) but seems to be a different problem, so I've moved away from that topic.

I have 32-bit Vista Home Premium (but with a 64-bit processor...don't know why the manufacturer did that), and haven't been able to install any updates since around March 2016. I've followed the instructions on page 1 of the Windows Update thread, and the first update I need to apply is kb3185911. When I try to install, I get the error "The update does not apply to your system". kb3185911 isn't in my list of installed updates, and there don't appear to be any prerequisites for it listed on its page on the MS site. I'm definitely trying to install the x86 (32 bit) version, and not the 64 bit version. Automatic updates are switched off.

To see what would happen, I tried to install some of the subsequent updates referred to on page 1 of the Windows Update thread, but get the same error each time: "The update does not apply to your system".

Any ideas what could be causing this?

Thanks.

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Windows update

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

67 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2017-03-20T21:30:34+00:00

    Hello again,

    Regarding the BSOD, the suggestions made on BleepingComputer haven't solved the problem, and I guess it's beginning to look like a hardware error causing these. The caveat here is that one suggestion was to update a storage driver - nvstor32.sys - but I haven't been able to find a more up to date version than the one I already have.

    So, if this is a hardware fault, that couldn't be causing the update failures could it? If not, what should I try next?

    Thanks

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Deleted

    This answer has been deleted due to a violation of our Code of Conduct. The answer was manually reported or identified through automated detection before action was taken. Please refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.


    Comments have been turned off. Learn more

  3. lmacri 2,505 Reputation points
    2017-02-24T13:41:51+00:00

    ,,,NAV has reported a clean bill of health: no security threats, nothing. Is it still worth trying Malwarebytes 2.2.1?

    If not, where next? The BSODs?

    Hi JL3008:

    That's not what I recommended in my previous post(s) but the free Malwarebytes is a good anti-malware scanner and might find a few potentially unwanted programs or modification (PUPs / PUMs) that weren't caught by your Norton Full System Scan.  If you have any issues running Malwarebytes they have a user forum where you can get help (see bdubrow's pinned topic Having problems using Malwarebytes? Please follow these steps).  As I said before, however, you have multiple problems on your machine (intermittent BSODs, System File Checker errors, Windows Update errors) and I doubt that a custom Full System scan by Malwarebytes is going to fix all those problems.

    If you want to know what I'd recommend just re-read my last two posts.  Having your dump files analyzed to determine the cause of your your BAD_POOL_HEADER BSODs in the bleepingcomputer Windows Crashes, BSOD, and Hangs Help and Support board as I suggested <here> on 09-Feb-2017 might be a good place to start.


    32-bit Vista Home Premium SP2 * Firefox v51.0.1 * NIS v22.9.0.71 * MBAM Premium v2.2.1

    HP Pavilion dv6835ca, Intel Core2Duo T5550 @ 1.83 GHz, 3 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2017-02-23T18:42:56+00:00

    Hello GWN,

    I've had boot time protection in NAV switched on for a couple of days now, and have also had NAV run a full system scan (with Windows launched in safe mode for a bit of extra belt and braces). NAV has reported a clean bill of health: no security threats, nothing. Is it still worth trying Malwarebytes 2.2.1?

    If not, where next? The BSODs?

    Thanks

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. lmacri 2,505 Reputation points
    2017-02-16T14:12:51+00:00

    So: the plan. First up, I'm going to try the free version of the Malwarebytes Anti-malware to see if it finds anything. After that, I guess there are three possibilities: pursue the SFC failure; reset update components (following the instructions  here as far as possible, bearing in mind that they are for W7); pursue the BSOD (I'm happy to post a dump up to bleepingcomputer). Having not had a BSOD for some weeks, the PC obliged by throwing one yesterday (BAD_POOL_HEADER)! It's like it wants to be fixed.

    Hi JL3008:

    Perhaps you misunderstood, but I did not recommend that you install and run Malwarebytes.  The current Malwarebytes 3.0 was just released a few weeks ago and has many known bugs listed <here> that were not fixed during beta testing.  If you accept the 14-day trial of real-time protection features during installation you could create a conflict your with Norton Security because of duplicated features (e.g., anti-exploit, malicious website protection).  Rootkits and bootkits often embed themselves deep in the Windows kernel, and if you run a custom rookit scan with Malwarebytes and it tries to automatically remove this type of infection there is a low but legitimate risk that the remediation could damage your Windows system files and leave your system unbootable.

    There is a growing overlap these days between antivirus programs that specialize in detecting high-risk malware like virus and trojans that can damage your OS versus anti-malware programs like Malwarebytes (my personal preference) and SuperAntiSpyware that are better at detecting lower-risk infections like adware, browser redirectors, and other PUPs/PUMs (potentially unwanted programs/registry modifications). See the Lifehacker article *The Difference Between Antivirus and Anti-Malware (and Which to Use)* - it's an older article but still has some good advice on this topic.

    If your Norton Security does not detect an infection you can't be 100% certain that your system is clean, especially if you use Norton's default settings and have boot-time protection disabled (Settings | Antivirus | Automatic Protection | Boot Time Protection) and have never scheduled a Full System Scan (Settings | Antivirus | Scans and Risks | Full System Scan | Configure).  I often recommend that Norton users run a second opinion on-demand scan with the free Malwarebytes Anti-Malware v2.2.1 (i.e., no real-time protection, no rootkit scan) if they are having performance problems like high CPU consumption or a browser that responds slowly, but your BSODs and failed System File Checker scan (sfc /scannow) indicate a more serious problem that likely can't be fixed by Malwarebytes.

    I would still advise that you let a trained malware removal specialist run a thorough diagnostic over at the bleepingcomputer Virus, Trojan, Spyware, and Malware Removal Logs board.  They can help you safely remove any malware that might be on your system and might also flag out-of-date, insecure third-party software that could be causing a problem.


    32-bit Vista Home Premium SP2 * Firefox v51.0.1 * NIS v22.9.0.68 * MBAM Premium v2.2.1

    HP Pavilion dv6835ca, Intel Core2Duo T5550 @ 1.83 GHz, 3 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments