Like I said in the File History conversation (http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1_pr-files/file-history-in-81/96dca7ff-03b0-4dfc-a4ff-1b70fa94b26e?tm=1373731683819#_self),
the fact that we're even having to discuss this is truly troublesome. These kind of things shouldn't get out of the draft stages, let alone actually integrated into a beta, much less final product.
(For those that don't know btw, File History in 8.1 is another regression - now there's no way to backup any data outside of Libraries/Contacts/Favourites, no way to create a backup image, and more important - Skydrive and other cloud storage folders are
skipped by it, so no version controlled backup for your cloud storage anymore).
This change is just so bizarre as it goes completely against the entire Modern UI philosophy - focus on
content, not apps. Telling us that "Well, there will probably be apps by their respective companies" completely misses the point and is just laughable in the complete lack of common sense displayed and the hypocrisy with regards to the entire
Modern UI philosophy to begin with.
While I welcome a more rapid update cycle in general, part of the fear from end users in adopting the rapid release schedule and thereby adding/subtracting features every year as opposed to just security fixes is that they don't have a choice to skip it
if they don't like the changes. With the thousands of API changes made in 8.1 to Metro apps (and most are needed), very soon if you want to be using Windows 8, you will be using 8.1 to run modern apps. The "option" of reverting back to 8.0 really
isn't practical. All you're doing now is re-enforcing that fear.
Maybe Facebook wants you to use their app, sure. Maybe Flickr does as well. And? Fight harder for your users. If that's the stipulation they've put out to in order to make apps, well then let the world know the reason Facebook and others won't make a
Win8 app.
Frankly, I'm extremely suspect of this assumption though. Windows Photo Gallery can upload to Facebook and Flickr for years, you're bypassing both of their sites for significant functionality you can do outside their app. As well, Facebook is obviously
far more than image downloading, you'll still need to use their app or visit their site for much of the functionality. Having their sources show up in the default Photo app would be like free advertising for them IMO.
Expecting users to bounce in and out of apps depending on the source the data is just ridiculous. If that's the case, then you'll push people
away from Modern apps and back to the desktop, where they have far more freedom and functionality. Especially when manually picking local files and folders is still far more cumbersome in the Modern environment than the desktop, you want your file
sources - remote and networked - to be integrated from the start and not require manual poking through the file system.
By Carmen's rationale, then excise LinkedIn, Twitter etc accounts from the People app! Shouldn't be able to respond to tweets and see my contacts when I can just launch Twitter and LinkedIn's apps, after all. Remove any trace of Xbox games from the Xbox
Games portal, or segregate them from the Windows...er, Xbox for Windows (yeesh) games.
Mail? Why have the ability to see your Yahoo/Gmail account in Mail? There are, or will be apps for those two services. So get rid of them in Mail.
This should not have to be explained.