Why would Microsoft remove the beautiful Aero Glass effect and replace it with flat colors and cheesy translucency?

Anonymous
2012-11-29T07:30:29+00:00

No Aero Glass is an absolute deal breaker for me.  There is no way I'm installing those ugly flat windows on my desktop.  The transparency that is there which lacks blurring is an ugly joke.  On a scale from one to ten of how upset I am over this... I'm like 1000000000 seriously considering buying a Mac out of pure out-of-my-mind crazy spite.  I cannot even express in words how upset I am over this.  There is absolutely zero chance that I will ever install Windows 8 or Blue or any another Windows operating system onto my computer until Aero Glass is returned or something more beautiful is included.

I am not developing a single app for Windows until Glass is added back.  For my next phone... I was considering Windows Phone 8.  I even stopped by and played with one at Verizon the other day.  No glass?  I'm not wasting my time looking for mods.  Windows Blue is going to be very sad, because I am ditching Windows permanently if glass is not added back, like now, like before I have to spend a single additional second trying to find workarounds on the internet.  Yep.  I can feel an Android Phone in my future, and a sudden love for Java, which I currently hate, coming on.  Feels like the incredible .NET is being abandoned too.  Guess I better go submit my resume to Google.

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Email and communications

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

75 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2016-12-15T21:37:16+00:00

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder . . .

    This is all a discussion about aesthetics.  It may be disguised as a choice discussion, but truly, it is aesthetics.  

    Other products (in all worlds of products) change look/feel and do not give options built-in to go back to the old look/feel.  The choice of using/not using/finding an acceptable work-around/using a different product still exists.

    Those who make the products choose the options available and none have satisfied 100% of possible customers nor will they likely ever do so.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2016-12-15T21:11:19+00:00

    Personally, I actually prefer Windows 8 over 10 in terms of looks. This is the age of VR, and regardless of what device you use, VR is the future. VR needs to look realistic, right? Now, Metro theme can be cool if done right. But the Windows 7 aero is what's cool to me! It's like a silver spaceship - and not one from the 90s. It's pristine, light, nice...

    Ok, the problem with Aero is that is only works with backgrounds that are blue, and a very saturated blue for that. I tried to look for some "Aero compatible" wallpaper, but the only one that works with Aero is the boring base desktop wallpaper. (I need photoshop! I can get rid of the Microsoft logo and add a super cool spaceship on that wallpaper!). When Aero is paired with any other color, specifically warm colors or gritty colors that most hardcore gamers like and use (yeah.) it becomes ugly and distracting. And I do know that 3d elements aren't always good - look at this garbage:

    https://www.imperica.com/images/stories/photo/0194/1001/au-al-0194-1001-04.png

    The thing I hate about metro is well, more links here:

    http://blog.usabilla.com/wp-content/uploads/Mark-Boulton-Design.png

    See, it's too featureless. Too grey, no color.

    When you said it looks like flash gordon serials, it might have been because of your wallpaper, or perhaps you monitor is weak. The best way to do 3d elements (in my opinion) are like what I said. Like the interior of a silver spaceship. In houses that look like this (CoD Black Ops 3 spoiler!):

    http://i.imgur.com/kwlXtVh.jpg

    Aero/aqua/whatever is best, but for these kind homes:

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/d0/59/9a/d0599ab57ea81b6bb6746ea1bd697233.jpg

    the place screams, METRO! 

    We can agree on one thing though. Beautiful UI should be so pretty, we don't even notice it. And if you like Merto, that's great. But we feel like we're being replaced and pushed out, you get it? Metro should have been an alternative to Aero, not a replacement. See what you think of this.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Deleted

    This answer has been deleted due to a violation of our Code of Conduct. The answer was manually reported or identified through automated detection before action was taken. Please refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.


    Comments have been turned off. Learn more

  4. Anonymous
    2016-06-22T03:15:25+00:00

    I agree with the Windows XP though. Back then, Apple was so much better than Windows, I don't know how XP got off the ground.  I'm not saying XP's bad, just that back then, Apple was sooooooo much better.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2016-06-07T15:36:36+00:00

    Just how is metro futuristic?

    This is an aero styled future city: http://www.futureofcities.ox.ac.uk/media/2014/04/Future-City-1300x728-600x270.jpg

    ie, Dubai is like that.

    Metro, despite what Bill says, seems an awful lot like the 50's theme for little children... or a cartoon...

    I'm not saying one is better than another truly, just stating facts. And no, one size does not fit all.

    You know, people said the same thing about Windows XP with its bright colors back in the day.

    We'll just have to agree to disagree. Personally, I consider the streamlined, easy to use design of the Screen far nicer than the convoluted Menu.  To me, Aero Glass is right out of the old Flash Gordon serials - total zeerust! :-) But what I really was saying was futuristic was the ability to have both UIs and program styles in one system side by side or one at at time as the user prefers - it's the functionality and flexibility that makes it "futuristic" rather than strictly the looks.

    Frankly, a big part of my acceptance of Metro comes from my loathing of the Start Menu - hated it in 1995, hate it to this day. So a big part of my liking it is simply the fact that it wasn't the Menu. ;-)

    And as for Aero specifically, I liked the actual functional elements - Aero Peek, that sort of thing. The things that actually could contribute to productivity, much of which is still present. The translucency effect I always found cheesy and distracting. It was cute, but added nothing of value to me. Which isn't to say it shouldn't be included - I just don't feel the need for its return that you do. Honestly, what I want back in 10 is the Start Screen.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments