Solution1: Have your Help Desk remove end users second monitor because it's "broke". Problem solved.
Solution2: If it bothers you that much, go back to Windows XP. Problem sovled.
You're right coldfire. I missed the point. Because the point is a waste of everyones talented time. I only took the time to post about it because of the absurdity of the whole situation. I'm honestly still shocked that people believe this is a "legit"
issue. I won't lose any sleep over it and neither should you. Educate your end users. Be happy they're locking their computer when they get up for their coffee or their smoke break every 10 minutes. And rest assured, that when they press
that magic little key sequence "Ctrl" + "Alt" + "Delete", their beautiful picture of the beach they vacationed on, or their pet dog, or sweet little kid, will be happily staring them in the face . . . on both screens
So aesthetics is a total waste of time for Microsoft, correct? They should simply stop development of visual elements that users desire? The OS would still work great if it had windows 95 era graphics, so they shouldn't have bothered with aero? The desktop
experience is part of what sells a modern OS and many users think that this particular part of that system is lacking. It isn't a waste of Microsoft's time if it makes the users of their OS happy. Since their main goal is to make money and its easier to keep
customers than find new ones, they tend to try and include features that users want. They don't care about making a OS they can be proud of, they want to make one that sells. While this may not be a big enough issue to make someone switch to another OS, it
might add to a list of other issues and complaints that might. If we can make it seem like it is worth the time for Microsoft to change this for us, then they will. It has nothing to do with functionality or creating a working OS for work environments. If
you don't like people complaining about a feature of software that they paid for, then your going to be upset an awful lot.