Unable to change Windows 7 Starter wallpaper!

Anonymous
2009-12-25T02:35:37+00:00

original title: Windows 7 Starter wallpaper!

Seriously!?!?!?!? You can't change the background wallpaper on Windows 7 starter!? Of course I understand that this version of Windows is meant to be very light on features for running smoothly on netbooks...but F-ing wallpapers? Microsoft does remember that they are still writing computer operating systems right? My dinosaur, Nokia cell phone from like 5 years ago let you change the wallpapers.  They left the gadget feature but not wallpaper!?!? This really proves to me that Microsoft has absolutely no clue what they are doing.  Windows 7 comes on just about every netbook now as of this current holiday season.  So here is my question...Why would anyone want a windows 7 netbook when XP (the operating system before the one before windows 7) had more features than it does? Apple is looking better and better. I didn't even get a netbook for christmas, and even though I really wanted one, i'm very glad I didn't. I'm not going to get one at all now if its got windows 7 on it.  I'll wait for that Apple tablet and that's it.  What do you say Microsoft?

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Accessibility

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Anonymous
2009-12-30T19:20:26+00:00

Hello socratesman,

Thank you for visiting the Microsoft Answers Community.

In Windows 7 Starter you are not allowed to change the desktop background. You cannot even replace the default image with another one because the system compares the file hash of your desired background with the file hash of the default wallpaper.

You have to upgrade to a more complete version of Windows 7:

Why can't I change my desktop background?

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Why-cant-I-change-my-desktop-background

Hope this helps


Chris.H

Microsoft Answers Support Engineer

Visit our Microsoft Answers Feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

Was this answer helpful?

1 person found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments

115 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2011-03-14T22:14:01+00:00

    The difference with the Windows 7 Starter edition is that the OEM computer manufacturers were able to convince Microsoft that they needed the Starter edition to keep the price of their Netbooks low enough to be competitive. This why Starter is avilable to the general public and this is why you are still able to purchase a Netbook for $300.

    Still, it seems to me like a very poor marketing decision to eliminate something so fundamental to the user's experience rather than bells and whistles like animated icons, etc.  I would expect Microsoft would use the netbook to attract new microsoft fans rather than drive them away.  The number of remarks I found on the net about the BSOD surprised me.  And it seems like many of my friends and all my nephews and nieces have moved away from windows.  Oh well...

    Also, I think there was an interface upgrade package for Windows 98, right??

    As you know, us (we??) users are a finiky bunch.  I'll grow to like the black screen rather than pay 30% of the cost of my computer (Premium) for an upgrade to get functionality I think should be in the OS.

    Anyway, thanks for the reply.  If you decide to release an aero upgrade for $30 or so, let me know and I'll think about it -- as long as I can turn off the features I don't want.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2011-03-14T08:55:53+00:00

    Still -- it seems strange to find that XP, Windows 98, Windows ME and Windows 3.1 and even Vista had a feature that has been pulled from new-and-improved Windows 7.

    Hi

    Prior to XP, there were no Starter editions of windows. If you do some research and look at the XP and Vista Starter editions, they were similarly configured to run on low end systems, with minimum resources. These were only available in third world, emerging markets.

    The difference with the Windows 7 Starter edition is that the OEM computer manufacturers were able to convince Microsoft that they needed the Starter edition to keep the price of their Netbooks low enough to be competitive. This why Starter is avilable to the general public and this is why you are still able to purchase a Netbook for $300.

    Microsoft Windows XP Starter Edition Fact Sheet:

    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/newsroom/winxp/WinXPStarterFS.mspx

    Windows Vista Starter Fact Sheet:

    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/newsroom/windows/factsheets/WinVistaStarterFS.mspx

    Regards.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2011-03-14T04:32:05+00:00

    Well -- I think I found the problem but don't understand it. I remember a value in the register that used to be

        Wallpaper=...\img0.jpg

    Now it is empty.  I tried resetting it and verifying that it was reset and rebooting and examining regedit found it is again empty.  I guess an empty Wallpaper is a black wallpaper.  Interesting...

    I guess I'll manage with a black wallpaper.  Putting another $90 into a $300 computer doesn't make much sense. 

    Still -- it seems strange to find that XP, Windows 98, Windows ME and Windows 3.1 and even Vista had a feature that has been pulled from new-and-improved Windows 7.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2011-03-11T17:55:31+00:00

    My  old Acer netbook with XP died with a bad hard disk so I couldn't reinstall so I bought a new one with Windows 7 starter.  First thing I wanted to do was get rid of the obnoxious background on the new system.  I replaced img0.jpg with  an image I liked and now I have a black background -- which is preferable to what I had before.

    I can't believe microsoft shot themselves in the foot by removing a feature that has been around since windows 3.1 (I think) and is so fundamental to the look of the OS.  If not for this, I might think about upgrading but there are enough other differences that I won't think of it without knowing what I'm upgrading to.

    On the + side, I got a new hard drive for the old system and it runs Ubuntu 10.10 just fine.  The only feature missing is that I can't use the web-cam on skype.   Since I hadn't used Linux for about 5 years and and wouldn't have thought of it now except for the background feature removal, I have to say thank you Microsoft.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments