Clean Install of Windows 11 Ni Preview Build works with Build 22557, but not with 22563, 22567, 22572, 22581, 22593, 25115

Anonymous
2022-03-11T03:48:13+00:00

I created all 5 installation ISO files for all 5 Builds, but only 22557 contains all the system Apps required for a full clean install, the other 4 are missing all the basic Windows and System Apps needed for a functional system. Also, the App required for opening Windows Security (Microsoft.SecHeatlthUI) is missing, all this makes the resulting system unusable.

Last one on 22557.

Microsoft.SecHealthUI Microsoft.SecHealthUI_1000.22557.1.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe

I noticed another issue common to all the Ni builds, if they are used for an upgrade or in-place they may only work correctly if they are done online allowing the check for updates.

If I use the option "Change how Setup download updates" to "Not right now", the upgrade or update in place still completes, but it creates a problem on subsequent W.U.

In this case W.U. goes in a loop trying to Download and Install the same Build over and over. Error 0xc1900401 is logged in that case.

I could not find a way out of that loop.

If I do the same upgrade or update in place online letting the Setup check for updates, as recommended, the process may complete correctly without subsequent W.U. loop issues, but the behavior is inconsistent depending on how the previous update was done.

The official MS Insider ISO 22579 includes all the required Apps and the Microsoft.SecHealthUI which is needed for opening Security.

Windows Insider program | Windows Insider preview | Install, activate, and Windows update

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments

232 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2022-05-26T02:18:46+00:00

    Hi guys,

    Not that it matters at this point but finally could create the Pro ISO of 25120.1010 using wimlib80f. I did have to run the download script twice to get full uups but conversion was smooth.

    Run the clean install offline and oobe\bypassnro did work for this build and installed offline with local account.

    Perhaps the fault was in previous versions of wimlib thus all the updates, who knows. This was for my curiosity and so done with this build🤣

    Regards,

    Thanks for sharing the results.

    I managed to get 25120.1010 yesterday, but it was still getting the error showing below during the conversion, it was the same error that Sibro saw.

    In my case I could still use oobe\bypassnro and everything worked for a clean install offline on a real laptop. Apparently was not the case for VM.

    It is good to know that they fixed this error with the latest script.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  2. Johnny55 5,155 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
    2022-05-26T01:44:11+00:00

    Hi guys,

    Not that it matters at this point but finally could create the Pro ISO of 25120.1010 using wimlib80f. I did have to run the download script twice to get full uups but conversion was smooth.

    Run the clean install offline and oobe\bypassnro did work for this build and installed offline with local account.

    Perhaps the fault was in previous versions of wimlib thus all the updates, who knows. This was for my curiosity and so done with this build🤣

    Regards,

    Edit: Oops, forgot to mention, this was in a compliant vm.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  3. Johnny55 5,155 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
    2022-05-25T19:16:45+00:00

    The final product is complete, all apps are there and oobe\bypassnro worked on this one

    Great, thanks for letting me know.

    Hey fg and Sibro,

    Confirm that oobe\bypassnro worked on 25126. If I have time will look into 25120.1010 if I ever get the CU added, perhaps with new wimlib today v80f.

    Regards,

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  4. Anonymous
    2022-05-25T18:43:33+00:00

    Good to know.

    It was probably a weird situation with those updates used to test the W.U. without real changes, like 25120 .1010. 🤷‍♂️

    Looks that way for sure.

    The final product is complete, all apps are there and oobe\bypassnro worked on this one

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  5. Anonymous
    2022-05-25T02:42:12+00:00

    Hi Johnny,

    Finally, in the evening of 5/24/2022 I managed to get 25120.1010 built as you can see here:

    Still, it reported several different errors during the process, see 2 of those below. 😒

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments