Mindcraft is written using the Java Run-time it is not a Win32 application. RT is locked for a reason, to prevent "DLL H3LL", Code Decay and Malware/Virus risks.
Win32's open eco-system is also its biggest problem, poorly written application cause instability in the OS, but typically the end user blames the OS not the Application. When people buy an ARM Device their expectation is that it will just work and not subject
to crashes.
I thought somebody said it was java. So the Java runtime would need to be compiled to run on ARM, again if Microsoft would let it run to start with.
DLL H3LL?? When was the last time that was a problem?? I personally can't recall the last time I ran into dll conflicts, it was probably before Vista at least. And I supposed Windows 8 is a wreck of an OS because it is unlocked? I'm sorry, but all the reasons
posted in defense of Microsoft's decision to limit what could have been a perfectly good Windows 8 version for ARM just aren't convincing me. I'm not comparing Ghz, ratings, but cross platform benchmarking, mostly the ones I've read on Anandtech for example.
Atom is x86 so it gets to run Windows 8. ARM gets stuck with a desktop OS that has purposefully been locked down to push WinRT instead. The difference between Microsoft and Apple and Google is the latter two took a phone OS and built it into a tablet OS, while
Microsoft took a desktop/laptop OS and is putting it on Tablets. So maybe I'm expecting a lot more from it. But again, why are they discriminating against ARM?
Yes, the hack/"jailbreak" is just a script to change the application signing level requirement. That's it. Yes, it has to be run after each boot, but then, I rarely reboot anyway. It is not any more unsafe than running Windows 8 on an Intel based machine.
Which is my whole point.
No, I'm not suggesting really demanding win32 applications be ported to ARM, but a lot of smaller utilites could run just fine. Some games too.
ARM was not designed for Linux or Android. ARM CPUs have been around far longer than either OS, especially Android. It's the other way around, the operating systems have been coded to run on ARM.
Malware? Windows RT comes with Windows defender. Sure preventing an executable from running to start with will keep it from getting infected, but that's a pretty poor reason to lock the desktop in my opinion. As a non-x86 CPU architecture it's already incompatible
with probably most viruses currently out there.
Sure some people will never want to unlock the ARM desktop, and that's just fine. But others would love the option. I'm not saying enable it by default, just give us the
option to enabled it. Even include a "use at your own risk" warning or something if they must. Windows being an open platform may have some drawbacks, but it is by far it's greatest strength as well.