Very interesting, because they have the same capacity as you. I think I set the battery degradation. Microsoft did not want to give us the full capacity of the battery.
Does anyone really believe these conspiracy theories? Why would Microsoft do such a thing?
I have a big issue with how this #BatteryGate incident was handled by Microsoft in terms of the length of time to provide a fix and the lack of information flowing from them. I do not believe for one minute that Microsoft intentionally caused the software
fault in an attempt to sell new hardware. The damage done to the Surface brand over this will take months, maybe years, to recover with many business people posting in these pages how they have stopped purchasing Surface devices for their employees.
Microsoft is a business and any practice of building in obsolescence can only ever be counter productive to their business goals. The SP3 I have is a business purchase and believe me it will be a while before I make another Surface purchase but it isn't
because I feel they did this deliberately.
Why are you considering it a conspiracy, when it's just a decision? Many have reported the exact same charge capacity after the upgrade. This could be Microsoft, hard coding a minimum charge capacity as part of the fix to get the batteries to charge, as
the minimum 144 mWh value would effectively mean the device would consider the battery charged within seconds. By hard coding a value below design, but well above 144 mWh, the device can consider the battery not fully charged when below, approximately, 34
Wh and continue to charge the battery.
It seems to me, the bug was an algorithm that calculated the charge capacity value, then only charged the battery when below that value, but the threshold for that charge capacity kept falling because the algorithm had a cascading error within it, which meant
the calculated capacity would always be lower than the last time.
Hard coding a minimum value of 34 Wh, means the battery would charge to at least that level. This seems like an interim measure, because some batteries might not fully charge to 42 Wh and some degraded batteries that can no longer reach 34 Wh would be charging
all the time (Some time in the future though).
Once the algorithm is fixed properly, I suspect the hard coded base value will be removed.
It's not a conspiracy, it's a temporary patch to get the devices up and running again!