Yes I am having the same problem with the $1500 dollar device that downloads slower than many phones. When I first purchased it, I tested the throughput on speedtest.net all of my other computers and devices will download anywhere from 20-40Mbs. The Surface
Pro 3 will only download at 3Mbs max. I didn't look at what it connects at since that doesn't really tell you what the actual throughput is. It is the same at WiFi hotspots so now I have a $1500 dollar computer that can't even stream HD youtube videos without
constantly buffering. I had to buy an edimax nano wifi usb adapter to get decent speeds. It doesn't stick out of the device far because it is so small. But now I don't have any open usb ports for a mouse or the usb stick that I use for school at my college.
But that $10 dollar usb adapter outperforms the internal one by far. Which is a huge shame Microsoft should seriously consider dropping Marvell from any of it's future products and it is not like Microsoft did not know about this from previous devices that
use Marvell's WiFi chip. The Xbox uses it too and they have the same issues.
I tested the speed before I did any updates and the Wifi speed was decent and I didn't have any connection issues at the time. Then the firmware update came out in late August and that is when I lost all of my WiFi speed. I tried to roll back but there
was no option for that and I tried to find the old driver from Microsoft, it is not available to download online. Only the newest version can you download. I also went to Marvell's website and it is not available on their website either to download, so I got
screwed. Although I can say it is an incredibly awesome device, except for the horrible WiFi which would be a deal breaker for many. I am still angry about it there is nothing I can do other then, when people inquire about the surface pro. I tell them that
it's great but the WiFi s*cks and I am going to do a youtube video on it as well since no-one else seems to have many videos on it and I believe the consumers should know about it before spending their hard earned money on something they may regret. If Microsoft
doesn't want me to make a video about it they can send me one for free. Because I am not going to turn the one I have in with all the tweaks and work I have on it. I have over 500 subscribers and over 200,000 views and I hardly even make videos.
I hope they come out with a firmware update soon. But the research I did on Marvell doesn't give me any confidence and while the chip looked good on paper it doesn't seem to perform in the real world. So you have an AC WiFi device with less than B device
speeds. Doesn't even make sense to have the AC WiFi if it cannot perform. It seems Microsoft should have stayed with a more tried and true technology at least for the WiFi part but the rest of it is quite revolutionary and I have only had it two weeks!!!
I have been using computers since DOS and I am currently enrolled and going to school to be a software engineer. It has nothing to do with the power plans or Hyper V. It makes no difference. Maybe it had something to do with connectivity but it has nothing
to do with throughput and download speeds, since receiving doesn't use power except for the device has to be on, transmitting uses power. The only possible fix is a firmware update or Microsoft ditch Marvell from its future products. I have a feeling this
is more Marvell's fault though and they are not worthy of any future business when they hurt your bottom line. I am not sure if Microsoft's placement for receiving and transmitting signals from the WiFi device is in an optimal place within the device though
or its antenna's. Anyone know? But knowing that other devices have the same problems makes me lean toward a cr*ppy integrated chip. I can be right next to the router or any router with full bars and slow throughput. 10-15 times slower than comparable devices
that are not even AC. None of the Reviews I watched on Youtube really mentioned this problem in any kind of depth, if at all.