Remove the "new" Outlook installed 8/25/2026 without damage to Outlook Classic?

James Forcier 5 Reputation points
2026-09-03T22:31:52.26+00:00

I use Microsoft Outlook 2016 (Classic). Can I remove the new Outlook installed 8/25/2026 without damage to Outlook Classic?

Outlook | Windows | New Outlook for Windows | For home
0 comments No comments

Answer recommended by moderator

AI answer

2026-09-03T22:32:06.76+00:00

Yes. Removing the account from new Outlook does not damage Outlook Classic, because new Outlook and Outlook Classic do not share the same local data file.

If the goal is to stop using new Outlook and keep Classic Outlook:

  1. In new Outlook, use the toggle at the top right and select Switch back to classic Outlook.
  2. If the toggle is missing, make sure Outlook (classic) is installed. If it is not installed, follow the install instructions in You can't open classic Outlook on a new Windows PC.
  3. If classic Outlook is installed but launch behavior still redirects to new Outlook, set this registry value to disable the automatic switch:
    • HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\16.0\Outlook\Preferences
    • UseNewOutlook = 0
  4. If new Outlook was preinstalled and needs to be removed from Windows, it can be removed with PowerShell using Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage and package name Microsoft.OutlookForWindows.

Warning: editing the registry or removing provisioned app packages affects app launch behavior for Windows and can impact all users on the device. Use those steps only if the toggle is not sufficient.


References:

AI-generated content may be incorrect. Read our transparency notes for more information.

Was this answer helpful?

1 additional answer

Sort by: Newest
  1. James Forcier 5 Reputation points
    2026-09-03T22:34:40.9366667+00:00

    Accepted. Thank you!

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.