Welcome to Microsoft Q&A!
Thank you for taking the time to share the detailed test results and observations.
Based on the information you've provided, the behavior you are seeing appears to be different from the scenario described in the Event ID 5719 article.
The article describes a transient Event ID 5719 (0xC00000E5, STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR) that may occur when the Netlogon service restarts on a Windows Server 2025-member server and initially attempts to establish the new Kerberos-based secure channel with an earlier-version domain controller. In that scenario, the client is expected to automatically fall back to the legacy Netlogon secure channel, successfully re-establish trust, and continue normal domain operations. The event is temporary and should not result in a persistent secure channel failure.
In your testing, however, the outcome appears different:
- nltest /sc_reset returns ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED (0x5)
- nltest /sc_change_pwd fails
- Test-ComputerSecureChannel reports that the secure channel is broken
- The issue occurs when the Windows Server 2025 member communicates with a Windows Server 2022 domain controller
These symptoms suggest an actual trust or authentication failure rather than the transient condition described in the article.
As part of the investigation, I would recommend verifying the following:
- Confirm that all Windows Server 2022 and Windows Server 2025 domain controllers are fully updated with the latest cumulative updates.
- Determine whether the issue occurs against all Windows Server 2022 domain controllers or only specific ones.
- Review Active Directory replication health using tools such as repadmin /replsummary and dcdiag.
- Confirm that the computer account password is consistent across all domain controllers.
- Review Netlogon and Kerberos operational logs on both the member server and the domain controller involved in the failure.
- Collect the Netlogon debug logs and pktmon traces referenced in the Microsoft article.
Since the documented fallback mechanism should preserve the secure channel, a reproducible failure when a Windows Server 2025 member communicates with a Windows Server 2022 domain controller could indicate either an environmental issue (for example, replication, machine account password, authentication policy, or patch-level differences) or potentially a product issue that requires deeper analysis.
Given the nature of the issue and the fact that you already have diagnostic logs and packet captures available, I would recommend opening a Microsoft Support case. While the community may be able to offer suggestions, Microsoft Q&A has limited ability to perform in-depth analysis of Netlogon traces, packet captures, and other diagnostic data. A support engineer can securely review the collected logs and determine whether the Kerberos-based secure channel negotiation is failing during the fallback process or whether another underlying factor is contributing to the trust failure.
I appreciate the thorough testing you've already performed. The diagnostic data you've collected should be very valuable in helping to narrow down the root cause.
If you find this information helpful, please consider clicking Accept Answer.
Thank you for using Microsoft Q&A.