A catalog of AI models in Microsoft Foundry that you can discover, compare, and deploy using Azure’s built‑in tools for evaluation, fine‑tuning, and inference
Suspected incorrect metering and pricing for FW-Kimi-K3 Data Zone Standard — Billing SR #2608160050000546
I need a technical investigation of the metering for my FW-Kimi-K3 Data Zone Standard deployment in Microsoft Foundry.
I already have a Billing Support case open: SR #2608160050000546. Billing Support advised that validating token classification, cached-input detection, meter mapping, and effective unit prices requires investigation by the Microsoft Foundry technical team.
For August 15, 2026, Foundry Monitor reports approximately:
- Input tokens: 6.19M
Output tokens: 73.99K
Total tokens: 6.26M
Requests: 181
Azure Sponsorship usage shows:
Model 15 Inp DZ Tokens: $55.70
Model 14 Inp glbl Tokens: $6.18
Model 12 Inp glbl Tokens: $0.74
Total: $62.62
These charges correspond almost exactly to a flat rate of $10 per 1M tokens:
$55.70 ≈ 5.570M tokens × $10/M
$6.18 ≈ 0.618M tokens × $10/M
$0.74 ≈ 0.074M tokens × $10/M
The combined quantity is approximately 6.262M tokens, which closely matches the 6.26M total tokens reported by Foundry Monitor.
This appears inconsistent with FW-Kimi-K3 pricing, which differentiates between input, cached input, and output tokens.
Could you please confirm:
What Model 12, Model 14, and Model 15 represent.
The effective unit price applied to each meter.
Whether input, cached-input, and output tokens are being mapped to the correct meters.
Whether cached input is being detected and billed correctly.
Whether my deployment is being incorrectly billed at approximately $10/M across all token types.
The deployment itself is working correctly. The issue is specifically the metering and pricing configuration.
Please escalate this to the Microsoft Foundry service team if service-level telemetry is required, and coordinate the findings with Billing Support under SR #2608160050000546 so that any incorrect charges can be recalculated and credited.
I can provide screenshots from Foundry Monitor and Azure Sponsorship Usage.Suspected incorrect metering and pricing for FW-Kimi-K3 Data Zone Standard — Billing SR #2608160050000546
I need a technical investigation of the metering for my FW-Kimi-K3 Data Zone Standard deployment in Microsoft Foundry.
I already have a Billing Support case open: SR #2608160050000546. Billing Support advised that validating token classification, cached-input detection, meter mapping, and effective unit prices requires investigation by the Microsoft Foundry technical team.
For August 15, 2026, Foundry Monitor reports approximately:
Input tokens: 6.19M
Output tokens: 73.99K
Total tokens: 6.26M
Requests: 181
Azure Sponsorship usage shows:
Model 15 Inp DZ Tokens: $55.70
Model 14 Inp glbl Tokens: $6.18
Model 12 Inp glbl Tokens: $0.74
Total: $62.62
These charges correspond almost exactly to a flat rate of $10 per 1M tokens:
$55.70 ≈ 5.570M tokens × $10/M
$6.18 ≈ 0.618M tokens × $10/M
$0.74 ≈ 0.074M tokens × $10/M
The combined quantity is approximately 6.262M tokens, which closely matches the 6.26M total tokens reported by Foundry Monitor.
This appears inconsistent with FW-Kimi-K3 pricing, which differentiates between input, cached input, and output tokens.
Could you please confirm:
What Model 12, Model 14, and Model 15 represent.
The effective unit price applied to each meter.
Whether input, cached-input, and output tokens are being mapped to the correct meters.
Whether cached input is being detected and billed correctly.
Whether my deployment is being incorrectly billed at approximately $10/M across all token types.
The deployment itself is working correctly. The issue is specifically the metering and pricing configuration.
Please escalate this to the Microsoft Foundry service team if service-level telemetry is required, and coordinate the findings with Billing Support under SR #2608160050000546 so that any incorrect charges can be recalculated and credited.
I can provide screenshots from Foundry Monitor and Azure Sponsorship Usage.