DISM Store component is repairable

Xander Warren 70 Reputation points
2026-08-18T09:02:46.8266667+00:00

I did a scan health command and it said the store component is repairable so I did a restore health command and after did a sfc also to clarify I did a sfc before and it said it could not find any integrity violations detected.

The restore health command said it was completed successfully and did a sfc after and restarted my pc when it said the same as above, did a scan health command after reboot and it said store component is repairable. What's going on? I did sfc and it still says the same above.

I'm on the latest august update for windows 11 version 25H2

Windows for home | Windows 11 | PC Health Checker
0 comments

2 answers

Sort by: Oldest
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Xander Warren 70 Reputation points
    2026-08-18T09:36:06.6766667+00:00

    Doing all the steps above all over again I managed to fix it. I also did a scan health command after the restore health command to make sure it worked and after restarting I did a sfc and dism scan health and they both came back good.

    An odd thing I noticed on the restart where the store component was repairable, my mouses took about 2 minutes to update to its normal dpi. And on the boot where it said no corruption detected the dpi was instant.

    Not sure what happened but something happened during boot I guess.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
  2. Ramesh Srinivasan 88,050 Reputation points Independent Advisor
    2026-08-18T09:36:58.6766667+00:00

    Hi,

    Please run the ScanHealth command again and then collect the latest CBS.log file.

    It's located at C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log

    Upload the file in your next reply. If the file is large, you may share it on OneDrive and post the link here.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.