DISM Store component is repairable

Xander Warren 70 Reputation points
2026-08-18T09:02:46.8266667+00:00

I did a scan health command and it said the store component is repairable so I did a restore health command and after did a sfc also to clarify I did a sfc before and it said it could not find any integrity violations detected.

The restore health command said it was completed successfully and did a sfc after and restarted my pc when it said the same as above, did a scan health command after reboot and it said store component is repairable. What's going on? I did sfc and it still says the same above.

I'm on the latest august update for windows 11 version 25H2

Windows for home | Windows 11 | PC Health Checker
0 comments

2 answers

Sort by: Newest
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Ramesh Srinivasan 88,050 Reputation points Independent Advisor
    2026-08-18T09:36:58.6766667+00:00

    Hi,

    Please run the ScanHealth command again and then collect the latest CBS.log file.

    It's located at C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log

    Upload the file in your next reply. If the file is large, you may share it on OneDrive and post the link here.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments
  2. Xander Warren 70 Reputation points
    2026-08-18T09:36:06.6766667+00:00

    Doing all the steps above all over again I managed to fix it. I also did a scan health command after the restore health command to make sure it worked and after restarting I did a sfc and dism scan health and they both came back good.

    An odd thing I noticed on the restart where the store component was repairable, my mouses took about 2 minutes to update to its normal dpi. And on the boot where it said no corruption detected the dpi was instant.

    Not sure what happened but something happened during boot I guess.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.