Solution: Install kb5122882 2026-09 Comulative Update on wsus server
Wsus and Windows 11 25H2 Asus clients sync successfully but never report status
Hello,
I'm troubleshooting a WSUS reporting issue that started immediately after installing the July 2026 cumulative updates on a Windows Server 2022 WSUS server and Asus Client
Environment
- WSUS on Windows Server 2022
- IIS 10
- HTTPS (8531)
- Clients: Windows 11 build 26200.65792
- WSUS version:
10.0.20348.1
Symptoms
Affected clients:
- Continue to contact WSUS successfully
- Appear in the WSUS console
- Can scan for updates
- Can download updates
- Show an updated Last Contact
- Remain stuck on "Not Yet Reported"
- Last Status Report stopped updating on 16 July 2026Hello, I'm troubleshooting a WSUS reporting issue that started immediately after installing the July 2026 cumulative updates on a Windows Server 2022 WSUS server.
Environment
- WSUS on Windows Server 2022
- IIS 10
- HTTPS (8531)
- Clients: Windows 11 build 26200.65792
- WSUS version:
10.0.20348.1
Symptoms
Affected clients:- Continue to contact WSUS successfully
- Appear in the WSUS console
- Can scan for updates
- Can download updates
- Show an updated Last Contact
- Remain stuck on "Not Yet Reported"
- Last Status Report stopped updating on 16 July 2026
Exemple:
- Last Contact: 21/07/2026
- Last Status Report: 16/07/2026
The issue started immediately after installing the July 2026 cumulative updates on the WSUS server.
Server log: C:\Program Files\Update Services\LogFiles\SoftwareDistribution.log
ReportingEvent.ValidateMiscData
ValidateMiscData: Rejecting MiscData entry with empty or whitespace-only value: t=
WebService.ValidateEventBatch
Event in batch failed to validate.
Exception: MiscData entry has empty or whitespace-only value: t=
ComputerBrand=[ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.]
ComputerModel=[ASUS EXPERTBOOK B1502CVA_B1502CV]
OSVersion=[10.0.26200.65792.0.0.0.0.0]
miscData=[
t=
...
]
What has been checked
- GPO configuration OK
- WUServer/WUStatusServer OK
- SSL certificate OK
- IIS OK
- Clients reach WSUS correctly
- Resetting SusClientId does not help
- Removing/recreating client objects in WSUS does not help
- Other vendors (HP, Dell, etc.) continue reporting normally
Windows for business | Windows Server | Devices and deployment | System management components
-
João Vieira • 0 Reputation points
2026-07-21T19:22:17.49+00:00 Try disable telemetry, adding this to the registry:
reg add "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\DataCollection" /v "AllowTelemetry" /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /fFollowed by:
gpupdate
wuauclt /reportnow -
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-07-22T06:24:41.34+00:00 I try, but not work this method.
Workaround: remove the kb5099540 from wsus server
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-03T21:17:47.38+00:00 Has anyone at Microsoft acknowledged this issue? If so, I have not seen it. This is not related to the metadata sync issues that were reported in KB5121986. This issue is directly related to a change introduced in the July LCU for Windows Server. I had to uninstall the July update for WS2022, KB5099540, just as Marco did. This immediately fixed the issue. Only certain clients are affected, as they seem to be reporting blank or null values for some data fields such as model identification.
-
-
shamu • 20 Reputation points
2026-08-06T09:00:27.0133333+00:00 Same problem here, some clients don't report back to wsus console. Didn't find a solution except uninstalling the cum update from July on the wsus server. But I don't want do that.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-06T12:15:21.64+00:00 If anyone installs the expected August LCU next week and finds that it either fixes this problem or reintroduces it, please post a comment to let us know. I will probably update my WSUS server last, after everything else has been updated. Thanks for the comments.
-
Jackson, Brandon • 5 Reputation points
2026-08-07T15:07:28.72+00:00 This issue affects Server 2025 as well, removing KB5099536 (the July Cumulative) is also the fix.
-
yachan • 25 Reputation points
2026-08-11T10:02:26.6033333+00:00 This issue affects 2019 server as well. I do not remove KB,
accept this issue, just only 6 Fujitsu clients in my enviroment.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-17T14:10:13.6566667+00:00 I was wondering if anyone who commented on this thread previously who experienced this issue has installed the August cumulative update on their WSUS server? I am updating all my other systems first, and may not get to updating the WSUS server until next week. I was interested to see if the August update introduces the same issue as the July update, or if Microsoft fixed that. Thanks.
-
shamu • 20 Reputation points
2026-08-17T14:16:06.99+00:00 It's not fixed. Same problem persists after installing August update on Server 2025.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-17T15:02:39.54+00:00 OK, thanks. I will see if there is a way that I can open a support incident with Microsoft. We don't have a paid support contract, so I'm not sure if that is something I can do. This doesn't seem to be a priority for them, they may not even be aware of this issue.
-
Bogdan BALASOIU • 0 Reputation points
2026-08-19T11:30:30.2033333+00:00 The
t=field contains values such as:7f4a7avfor HP Elite Mini 600 G9550b4avfor HP Elite 800 G9LENOVO_MT_12TY_BU_Think_FM_ThinkCentre M70t Gen 5for Lenovo ThinkCentre M70t Gen 5079Cfor Dell OptiPlex 7450It appears to be a manufacturer-provided hardware identifier.
Another field that is not populated in the reports is:
ApplicableUpdateInfo=For older clients, I also observed entries such as:
AppName=[AutomaticUpdates] OSVersion=[6.1.7601]where
OSVersion=[6.1.7601]corresponds to Windows 7.There is also a field in the form:
g=00CB4C21-B7D0-4F11-8694-8D80E881921C| 12710F51-6D71-4886-8D91-D211CC1DCF3A| 0B8CF281-9524-4874-A677-DA30E5F951DB| AFBC8884-8812-49D8-B639-6C7326785B01WSUS attempts to parse this field using
ParseGuidArrayString(), which results in errors similar to:Guid should contain 32 digits with 4 dashesIf we compare it to:
V=GUID;GUID;GUID;GUID;GUID...the only noticeable difference is the delimiter. For
V=the delimiter is a semicolon (;), whereas forg=it is a pipe character (|).The data was extracted using:
PowerShell
1
Select-String -Path "C:\Program Files\Update Services\LogFiles\SoftwareDistribution.log" `
2
-Pattern "miscData=" > miscdata.log
Show more lines
Additionally, I noticed that systems which do not update correctly often report:
BiosReleaseDate=[1/1/1900]at least in my environment. This appears to be common among the affected systems.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-19T12:49:40.0133333+00:00 I am wondering if there might be a registry value that we can update on the non-reporting clients to make WSUS happy with the reported data. It seems to not like the fact that the MiscData value is blank. I have searched through the registry for a MiscData value, but so far I have not found anything. This value may be based on some other values, but I don't know what those are.
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-08-27T10:25:10.2766667+00:00 Nothing to do, same problem on August 2026
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-08-27T10:26:21.3766667+00:00 Problem not fixed on august cumolative update
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-27T12:15:43.4266667+00:00 Same here. I installed the August update after patching all my other systems, and it brought this problem back. Hopeully, I can still uninstall the August update to get it back to working. I did do some research trying to find a registry value that might be related, but ultimately there was no fix. I found some registry values that are blank on the problem systems and I tried putting data into those blank values but it didn't fix anything, and after rebooting the server the values went back to blank. So, this info probably comes from the BIOS itself, which I don't think we can change. Here are the registry values I looked at and tried adding data to the blank values:
Key: HKLM\HARDWARE\DESCRIPTION\System\BIOS
These string values are blank on the problem systems:
BaseBoardManufacturer
BIOSVendor
SystemManufacturer
SystemProductName
-
João Vieira • 0 Reputation points
2026-08-27T21:24:19.3166667+00:00 My previous comment about disabling telemetry was incorrect and does not provide a solution for this WSUS issue.
I have several servers and workstations that are not reporting. Depending on the machine, my approach was to check for blank values returned by msinfo32 and populate them using a compatible DMI editor for each device.
One of the last machines where I resolved this issue was an old Intel NUC that had the System SKU field blank in msinfo32. I wrote a value (I used the same value as the model), confirmed that it appeared correctly in msinfo32.exe, and everything looked fine — but the reporting status in WSUS still did not change.
This is where the actual fix happens. 😉
First, you need to remove/delete the affected machine from the WSUS console. Then, on the client, stop the Windows Update service, delete the C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution folder, and start Windows Update again or manually check for updates. This clears what appears to be persistent metadata both on the WSUS server and on the client.
It is expected that Windows Update will return errors after these steps. You need to retry the update scan three or four times until the machine finally updates and starts reporting successfully again. This behavior occurs with the August 2026 update installed.
Good luck!
-
Adam J. Marshall • 11,031 Reputation points • MVP2026-08-27T21:29:29.03+00:00 The client side script method exposes this is client side yet again.
https://www.ajtek.ca/wsus/client-machines-not-reporting-to-wsus-properly/
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-27T22:06:48.0133333+00:00 Can someone explain what the theory is about what is going on here/ What I see is that if you update the server with the LCU, a bunch of clients that are sending blank values that shouldn't be blank start getting rejected and we can't track their status anymore. Removing the LCU restores the functionality (no change on client required). What does resetting all of this stuff on the clients, while waiting up to 48 hours to see if anything changed, do? I get that occasionally client configuration information gets corrupt and needs to be cleared out and reset, but this situation seems different. The client info isn't "corrupt", it just has blank values that the server doesn't like.
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-08-28T06:24:26.2433333+00:00 @Adam J. Marshall I try this method on july and doesn't work. Even after reinstalling the operating system, the issue persists.
As soon as I uninstall the LCU from the Windows Server 2022 server, the affected client starts working normally again.
This is why I don't believe the problem is related to client corruption or a bad client configuration. A clean OS installation does not resolve it, while removing the LCU immediately restores functionality.
From my testing, the issue appears to be directly related to the LCU and its interaction with these specific clients.
@William Fourqurean You're correct. Some clients are affected by this issue, and they all seem to be from the same manufacturer. In my case, they're ASUS devices.
I've checked and there are no BIOS updates available for them. I also tried completely reinstalling one of the affected clients, but the problem remained.
At the moment, I have a Windows Server 2022 system that I cannot patch because of this issue. The problem appears to be related to the interaction between the updated server and these specific clients rather than to client corruption or configuration problems.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-28T10:22:50.93+00:00 Hey Marco, I forgot that you had totally rebuilt one of your systems. In my case, I have 14 servers that are affected. They are Dell servers, but they are OEM models that were rebranded, by our security vendor, Genetec. They have blanks in the BIOS for System Model Name and for System Manufacturer. I'm attaching a picture of one server that I updated the BIOS on yesterday. I even reset all BIOS settings to default, but there is no way to edit those two blank fields. I have one server that is also an OEM model from the same vendor, but is the newest one (all are several year old). The newest server does not have blanks in those fields in the BIOS, and the reporting works normally. I see no way to solve this problem from the client side.
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-08-28T10:29:10.3766667+00:00 My situation:
Virtual Server: Vmware and Hyper-V no problem
Hp server: no problem
Lenovo server no problem
Client Asus: Problem on all client (different type: notebook and classic pc)
Client Hp: no problem
Client Dell: no probelm
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-28T12:21:43.8266667+00:00 Any chance that we can get this discussion set back to unanswered? I don't know if Microsoft monitors these discussions, but I have seen no acknowledgement of this issue. If it is marked as answered when it is still unresolved, that may reduce our ability to get attention to the issue. I asked internally at my organization, and presently I have no way to open a support incident with Microsoft, as we don't have a support agreement. I guess there is always a possibility that the issue may be fixed in an upcoming cumulative update, but without an acknowledgement of this as an issue, I don't feel hopeful.
-
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-28T12:45:58.5566667+00:00 Thanks Marco! Yes I see from the picture and the log data that you sent before that the manufacturer and model information is not blank like it is on my systems. However, it seems like there is some other value that is blank that the server doesn't like. Without a way to reverse engineer the reporting process or change the validation of the data that is uploaded by the client, I think we are dependent on Microsoft to either fix this issue or tell us what their stand on the issue is. Granted, having blank values is not preferred but since it has been accepted for years and now is being rejected with no proposed workaround, that means that a small portion of our managed systems cannot be updated via WSUS anymore. I feel that WSUS is no longer a priority for Microsoft, as they are encouraging the community to migrate to other solutions. Thanks again!
-
Adam J. Marshall • 11,031 Reputation points • MVP2026-08-28T17:23:13.7166667+00:00 That's not true. Microsoft fully supports WSUS until at least 2035.
Have you created a ticket with Microsoft for this issue?
If not create a ticket and let me know the ticket number. I can use my contacts to push it forward.
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-08-28T17:27:54.53+00:00 @Adam J. Marshall I do not have any type of support plan or subscription. Where can I open a support ticket with Microsoft?
Thanks
-
Adam J. Marshall • 11,031 Reputation points • MVP2026-08-28T17:47:20.2133333+00:00 I'm pretty sure you have to pay for a single incident option and when Microsoft confirms that it is their issue with Windows updates they will not charge your card or they will refund you if they already have.
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-08-28T18:39:09.1633333+00:00 @William Fourqurean i found this post on reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1v39xra/wsus_rejects_reporting_events_during/
Microsoft is aware of the issue, and it should be resolved with the September patch.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-28T18:39:31.6766667+00:00 I also would like to know how to contact Microsoft support to open an issue. We don't have a service contract, and I looked for how to open a support incident, and I could not find anything. I asked if I could contact Microsoft through our parent organization, but I never heard back, so I haven't been able to move forward with getting any help, other than through this user discussion.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-08-28T18:51:02.8233333+00:00 Thanks for sharing that info Marco! There is a lot of information in that Reddit thread. Hopefully it will be fixed soon. I would be nice if Microsoft posted an acknowledgement of this issue somewhere.
-
Adam J. Marshall • 11,031 Reputation points • MVP2026-08-28T19:08:00.7433333+00:00 -
yachan • 25 Reputation points
2026-08-30T07:43:01.94+00:00 There were three issued clients in my environment.
I’m writing to let you know that two of them have been fixed.
All three are Fujitsu models.
Two are Lifebook FMVU09003, and one is an ESPRIMO FMVK09001.
Assuming the issue is on the client side, I updated the Lifebook’s BIOS to the latest version. However, there was no change. But after deleting all the files in the SoftwareDistribution\EventCache.v2 ,
I was able to confirm that reports were being sent to the WSUS server.
I fixed my second Lifebook today.
-
yachan • 25 Reputation points
2026-08-30T07:45:55.4133333+00:00 Before Bios updated, 10.68.0.128 is version 1.10, and Not yet reported.
10.68.0.141 was fixed one several days before that I wrote.
-
yachan • 25 Reputation points
2026-08-30T07:50:41.9266667+00:00 After updated Bios, but not yet changed. I needed to clean up SoftwareDistribution folder by using Marshall's client script https://www.ajtek.ca/wsus/client-machines-not-reporting-to-wsus-properly/
-
yachan • 25 Reputation points
2026-08-30T07:58:12.58+00:00 The target 10.68.0.128 was fixed, But ESPRIMO is still in problem, that was updated the latest bios and cleared before. Need to another BIOS. I think ASUS and Fujitsu also need to fix this issue.
Since the OS version has been updated(1509.~), I believe there are no issue with my WSUS server. Well, I have just one to fix, or close to watch.
-
Edward_ZH • 0 Reputation points
2026-09-08T07:05:52.4766667+00:00 We are experiencing the same WSUS issue after applying the August updates. Currently, the only workaround is to uninstall the update. Are there any alternative solutions or recommended mitigation steps that do not require removing the update?.
-
Adam J. Marshall • 11,031 Reputation points • MVP2026-09-08T12:50:26.31+00:00 Have you created a ticket with Microsoft for this issue?
If not create a ticket and let me know the ticket number. I can use my contacts to push it forward.
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-09-09T09:34:21.76+00:00 @William Fourqurean today i have install kb5122882 2026-09 Cumulative Update on wsus server and now Asus Client reported correctly!!
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-09-09T12:24:04.6233333+00:00 Hi @Marco that is great news! I appreciate you sharing all your experiences on this issue with the group! Finally, we have an answer!
Sign in to comment
2 answers
Sort by: Newest
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-09-09T09:37:19.3+00:00 -
Edward_ZH • 0 Reputation points
2026-09-10T05:55:00.7833333+00:00 As additional information, our WSUS server is running on Windows Server 2019. We have observed that client reporting functionality returned to normal after installing KB5122876 on the WSUS server.
Sign in to comment -
-
Domic Vo • 32,140 Reputation points • Independent Advisor
2026-07-21T15:20:56.3066667+00:00 Hello,
The behavior you’re seeing is tied directly to the July 2026 cumulative update on Windows Server 2022. The WSUS server is still handling synchronization, downloads, and client contact correctly, but the reporting pipeline is breaking at the validation stage. The log entries you shared (
ValidateMiscData: Rejecting MiscData entry with empty or whitespace-only value: t=) confirm that the WSUS reporting web service is rejecting status reports from affected ASUS clients because of malformed MiscData fields. This explains why “Last Contact” updates but “Last Status Report” remains frozen.The fact that HP and Dell clients continue reporting normally points to a vendor‑specific issue in how ASUS systems populate the MiscData block during status reporting. The July update likely tightened validation logic in WSUS/IIS, so previously tolerated empty fields are now rejected. That matches the
WebService.ValidateEventBatchfailure you’re seeing.At this point, the recommended path is to confirm whether Microsoft has acknowledged this regression in the July 2026 CU. If not, the workaround is to temporarily disable strict validation by rolling back the cumulative update or applying the latest servicing stack/hotfix once released. Another option is to monitor for a vendor BIOS/driver update, since MiscData often includes hardware descriptors that WSUS parses.
For immediate troubleshooting, you can capture the full client report payload with
bitsadmin /list /verboseor by enabling WSUS client logging (%windir%\WindowsUpdate.logon Windows 11 viaGet-WindowsUpdateLog). This will show exactly which MiscData field is malformed. If it’s consistentlyt=, then the ASUS WU client is sending an empty telemetry tag that WSUS now rejects.I hope you've found something useful here. If it helps you get more insight into the issue, it's appreciated to accept the answer. Should you have more questions, feel free to leave a message. Have a nice day!
Domic Vo.
-
Marco • 61 Reputation points
2026-07-21T19:21:31.9266667+00:00 Thanks, i have remove the update and the Asus Client reporting to wsus.
-
William Fourqurean • 10 Reputation points
2026-07-26T11:49:05.15+00:00 I am having this same issue. I uninstalled the July update from the WSUS server, and it resolved the issue. The affected client systems are reporting blanks for ComputerBrand and ComputerModel.
Sign in to comment -