Hi Yea So,
You are quite correct! "Cit." is my acronym for citation; BSS and CMS are both types of citations, and for the purpose of handling them to calculate settlement or payment in full (meaning no discount given) of payoff values, they are both treated identically.
A CVN (for civil violation notice) fee (also known as a miscellaneous CVN fee) is used to include additional fees on an account, above and beyond interest. Misc. CVN Fees can be added to all product types, not just citations. This can be used to cover lien fees and/or satisfaction recording fees. We also use it when we receive a surplus check and the check is more than the total of all the liens' total debt (a/k/a TD) + our cost (see "Terms" row on cell V15 of the worksheet "Recap Surplus Hrdshp Stlmnt"). TD or total debit is defined as the LFV + interest + any lien fees (when applicable).
For instance, if we receive a surplus check for $48,000 and the total debt (without giving any reduction) is still less than $48,000, we can add the difference between the $48,000 and the sum of all the liens' total debt (again with no discount given) by using the Misc. CVN Fee bucket or column to reach the $48,000 figure. If the sum of all the liens' total debt (TD) + our cost without (giving any discount) is say, $42,000, then on one or more accounts we can add a total of $6,000 to the Misc. CVN Fee bucket or column, so that our total = $48,000. That way, we can apply the surplus funds ($48,000) to all the accounts and not have any leftover money not applied.
A quick question: what is a DIM table? I like to be clear on the terms we use.
I think I may now realize what you mean when you say in the post two above (copied, indented, bolded and colored in red font) below to be clear) when you mention intuitive, that didn't click with me before. Yes, I agree that it's more intuitive to go to a column to grab the type of data titled in that column when you need the column's data for a given calculation as opposed to the granular detail of a certain cell #. If that's what you mean by intuitive, then yes, I think that would be preferred versus grabbing a particular cell # (as long as the column correctly pulls data from the desired row[s]).
Hi Daryl,
I'm testing the body of the form to be a table so the formulas can be written this way:
=IF(
OR([@CalcType]="23IDFNA",[@CalcType]="24IDFA", [@CalcType]="IF3",[@CalcType]="ME-F3"),
[@BaseAmt]*0.12/365*([@GdThru]-[@RecDate])*[@[Disc%]],
[@BaseAmt]*0.18/365*([@GdThru]-[@RecDate])*[@[Disc%]])
do you think it's more intuitive than referencing cells but instead referencing the column name for the calculation of that row? I'm still trying it since i've never used it before.
Cheers! I recently got home from work, and need to eat my dinner now! Stay well, safe and strong!
Sincerely,
Daryl