'Helvetica neue light' font stopped displaying correctly

Anonymous
2018-01-21T00:10:34+00:00

'Helvetica neue light' font stopped displaying correctly in outlook for mac and word for mac V16.9. It was working fine previously. I have tried validating the font and file with Font Book. It works ok in Excel. Can you suggest a solution?

Microsoft 365 and Office | Word | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Anonymous
2018-02-08T09:20:05+00:00

Hello everyone,

Thank you for sharing your feedback regarding fonts not working as expected after upgrading to Word for Mac version 16.9. 

As Sky mentioned, the new Word version 16.9.1 has been released. It addresses compatibility issues in Word with some third-party fonts or in mixed-language environments. If you have not upgraded to 16.9.1, we recommend downloading and installing the update from this article.

If the font issue persists in version 16.9.1, to help every community member who come across this thread easily identify the needed information, we have summarized the symptoms for your reference:

==========================================================

Symptom 1:

'Helvetica neue light' font not displaying correctly in Word for Mac

Solution:

The issue has been fixed in Word 16.9.1. You can download and install the update from this article.

More information:

Several users mention Word 16.9.1 has fixed the issue with 'Helvetica neue light' font. However, if this does not fix the 'Helvetica neue light' font issue for you, please leave your comment in this thread. Microsoft Forum Moderator may contact you to collect more information for further troubleshooting.

==========================================================

Symptom 2:

Other built-in font not working as expected in Word 16.9.1.

Current Status:

We will test "Helvetica Neue Condensed Bold" and share our findings shortly.

@Henry Hwong, thank you for bring this up to us.

Action Plan:

If you are facing issues with a different built-in font, please post in this thread and share the affected font with us. We will further investigate the issue and provide an update in the same thread.

==========================================================

Symptom 3:

Third-party font cannot be found in Word 16.9.1 but works fine in Excel 16.9 and other applications.

Current status:

We have received several threads regarding this symptom. The issue has been escalated to our Engineering team and we are actively working on this. We will continue to monitor the progress and share the latest status via this link.

==========================================================

Others

If the font problem you are facing with Word for Mac version 16.9.1 is not listed above, we appreciate if you can post a new forum thread so that we can focus on different types of font problems individually. Forum moderators will help to categorize similar issues and redirect you to a parent thread if needed. This will also help community members to identify the issues and subscribe to the related parent thread for latest updates.

*You can subscribe to a thread by clicking the eclipse next to " I have the same question" and click "subscribe".

==========================================================

We appreciate your posts and feedbacks and will continue working with related teams to address the issues above.

Regards,

Kelly

Was this answer helpful?

10+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Anonymous
2018-04-10T11:20:58+00:00

The Insider Fast version of Microsoft Word released yesterday, 16.13 build 180409, RESTORES POSTSCRIPT TYPE 1 FONTS TO THE FONT MENU. @Sky Pei  @Jim Gordon MVP

The few I've tried are working normally in newly created documents, and documents that would not open with correct fonts in any version since Word 15.41 do open correctly in this one.

The long wait has been aggravating, but many thanks to the developers at Microsoft for persisting and apparently getting this under control (or at least being on the way to doing so; the Berkeley font family problem that I reported separately remains).

@Nislander, 16.12 did not restore the Postscript fonts when I tried it in the Insider version. / Rich

Was this answer helpful?

2 people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments

84 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Jim G 134.1K Reputation points MVP
    2018-01-28T15:52:06+00:00

    Hi

    Anyone who still has problems after installing the 16.9.1 update should take a moment to report the issue to Microsoft using the Smile button in Word (or Excel or PowerPoint). The smile button is located at the upper right corner of the document/workbook/presentation window.

    In Outlook, click the question mark, similarly located near the upper right corner of Outlook windows.

    Outlook users may get a response within a day or so in the lower right corner of the Outlook window.

    Microsoft is referring hundreds of people to this particular Q&A (I feel sorry for Mary Ret, who started this question - what an imposition!). Please return to this question for updates from Microsoft (hopefully, anyway).

    You can subscribe to this question to get email notifications by clicking subscribe in the Reply button directly underneath the question.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Deleted

    This answer has been deleted due to a violation of our Code of Conduct. The answer was manually reported or identified through automated detection before action was taken. Please refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.


    Comments have been turned off. Learn more

  3. Anonymous
    2018-01-28T12:59:47+00:00

    I was able to install 16.9.1. (Alberto, I deleted my 16.9.10 Word app first.)

    Sadly, Gotham still doesn't appear in my font menu, and Gotham is still being substituted by Calibri in my pre-existing documents. / Rich

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments