I stand corrected. I obviously overlooked the fact that Office Starter is in the list of programs. Thanks for pointing it out!
It was in fact the prerequisite you mention that confused me. I wouldn't expect a service pack for the full version of Office to be required for an update that applies to Starter.
I have now edited my previous message, explaining that my initial statement was incorrect.
Thanks... do you think that the "prereq" service pack (2687455) is apparently not a true prereq (since "dependent" or "downstream" updates like 2883019 seem to install successfully without it, even though KB2883019 lists 2687455 as a prereq)?
In fact, 2883019 seems like a relatively minor update, designed to address: "When you try to activate an Office 2010 program by using a MAK key, you may receive the following error message..."
I suspect that 2687455 is only a "soft prereq" for 2883019 (since the product works without it); I haven't seen "MAK key" defined... perhaps Microsoft Activation Key? ... but it's probably license-activation related, which would fit with comments in the
community about C-T-R licensing and its current suitability for widespread adoption by the consumer market.
I would suggest that this confusion should be escalated to product management; that probably requires attention from someone with more clout than a single retail customer. As a product manager, I would want to know when customers are getting this much miscommunication, through
official KB channels, about "my" product. That indicates a KB QA problem, several of which have been reported here in the Community for December 2014 updates.
(In the meantime, I am going to check KB2687523, "technical information about each Service Pack 2 (SP2) update that has been released for the Microsoft Office 2010 client products," to see if we can learn anything more about 2687455, although the article
dates back to mid-2013.)