Access 2013 runtime and SP1

Thanks JP-VP,

I read all of that, in it's entirety, and posted some "Feedback" advising them that MANY users are reporting problems with the Access Runtime(s) (32 and 64 bit) ... and are unable to distribute their runtime application(s).

The current Runtime is apparently NOT the "SP1"version, as it has a version number of 15.0.4517.1004

Here goes a doozy.

My dev PC has Office 2013 365 ProPlus

     Office Updates Version : 15.0.4605.1003

     Access Version (About MS Access) : 15.0..4601.1000

2 Client PCs

     Same Office 2013 365 ProPlus and versions

20 Clients PCs

     Office 2013 Business (Word/Excel/Powerpoint/Outlook)

              15.0.4605.1000

     Access 2013 Runtime

On January 3rd 2014, I upgraded an Access 2000 database (FE) to 2013 and deploy it on new

windows 7 systems. Everything worked as expected, no issues whatsoever. Then last week I updated some code and created a new ACCDE, just as I did back in January, and now all of the client PCs (even the 2 with 365) show the same error "unrecognized format" error.

Naturally I recreated the file from scratch (New 2013 database) and imported forms and modules, decompiled and recompiled, compressed and repaired the brand new ACCDE file, same results. Plant B, new and empty database saved as ACCDE, same results.

What gives?

The bright side is that I kept a copy of the database still in Access 2000 format and updated the code I needed on my windows xp machine with office 2000 pro and created an MDE file, which runs just fine on all the Client PCs.

I guess I'll drop Access from my subscriptions and keep my windows xp machine off the grid to maintain my application until the Access 2013 Runtime team gets their act together.

I was planning on upgrading my application look and feel to the goodies of the new Access, but I think I'll rewrite my application in VB.NET to avoid all these issues.

Thanks

Yes "Sven",

[Begin Rant Mode]

I believe that Microsoft has really been shooting themselves in the foot with all of this versioning, and that "casual" or "hobby" programmers in particular are not going to stand for it.

The bottom line is, we laid out the cash ... and just plain expect it to work!

Many of us were ill-advised on what product to buy from the MULTITUDE of "Office 365" and/or "Desktop" versions, and the jury is still out with my personal decision.

I'm "locked in" on Home Premium until late August, with no recourse to upgrade to something else. The upside to that, I suppose, is that it gives me some time to investigate some alternatives ... whether they include Microsoft Access or not.

Microsoft should have just stuck with the Access97 model. Either you're a Developer or you're not. (and if you decide you want to be a developer, pay for an upgrade to what you bought. Period.

Don't mislead the newbies dangling that carrot of "cloud computing" (SharePoint Services) just out of reach ... Dear God, none of us can afford to dream of owning an "Enterprise" version!

Actually, from what I've read ... there are no more "Web Database" capabilities in Office 365 at all, with the exception of Access 2010 / SharePoint Sever 2010 users being "grandfathered in".

Like I said, I'm still studying, and encountering a LOT of both reading and confusion.

Here's another example of "Upsizing" and related confusion:

[Quote]

Note   SkyDrive is now OneDrive, and SkyDrive Pro is now OneDrive for Business. Read more about this change at From SkyDrive to OneDrive.

[/Quote]

Don't even want to "go there" on the "Context-Sensitive Access Help" issue, what a freaking JOKE that has become!

Yeah ... "shot themselves in the foot" is precisely what they have done!

[End Rant Mode]

I just read that MS is working on getting runtime 2013 SP1 pushed out as soon as possible.

I just read that MS is working on getting 2013 SP1 pushed out as soon as possible.

Do you mean for the Runtime Version of Access 2013 (365), Bill?

WHERE did you read it? (Link, Please)

Thanks