How to display figure number only in cross reference

Anonymous
2012-03-09T17:01:27+00:00

Is there a way to have a cross reference to a figure only display the number, without displaying the label?

For example, I want to reference several figures at once, so it is most natural to say "see Figures 1,3,6, and 9".  It is less natural to say "see Figure 1, Figure 3, Figure 6, and Figure 9",

Microsoft 365 and Office | Word | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Stefan Blom 352.7K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
2012-03-09T19:53:23+00:00

After you have inserted the cross-reference, add a so-called numeric picture switch to specify a number format. To do that, press Alt+F9 to display field codes; you'll find that the cross-references are REF fields. Add # "0" to the end of the relevant REF fields. Press Alt+F9 again to hide the codes, and press F9 to update fields in the selection.

Alternatively, manually add a bookmark around the figure number and then insert a cross-reference to the bookmark text.

Was this answer helpful?

100+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Stefan Blom 352.7K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
2012-03-15T22:46:33+00:00

OK, if heading numbering is included with the captions, you can't use the workaround with the numeric switch.

Edit: You actually can use a numeric switch; see Suzanne's article at http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm.

As previously suggested, you can add a bookmark around the caption number and insert a cross-reference to bookmark text. Alternatively, use the "kludgy" workaround in the article at http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm.

Was this answer helpful?

10+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments

55 additional answers

Sort by: Oldest
  1. Stefan Blom 352.7K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
    2014-06-07T18:28:12+00:00

    Are you using Word's built-in master document feature? In that case, you may have more serious problems, because master documents tend to corrupt (this is a long-standing issue in Word); see http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/RecoverMasterDocs.htm (but note that the article isn't updated for the most recent version of Word).

    If you must use several separate documents, using the INCLUDETEXT field will be safer. Just add the ! switch to the INCLUDETEXT field code, to ensure that cross-references and other fields won't change in the target file until they have been updated in the source files.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2014-06-07T22:11:42+00:00

    uuuu... now you scared me! Well, the master document I will use only to print the thesis (as a pdf), I'm not planning to do any work on it after assembling the chapters. For minor editing I will use the editing features of adobe acrobat. At least that is the plan...

    I have done previously some tests to see how my costum made template would work once assembled in a master document, and did not have any problem... But according to Murphy's Law something can/will happen later.

    Your first sentence made me wonder, is there any 3rd party master document-like software or add-in for word? safer then word's?

    By the way, I completely gave up on the cross reference for the chapters. I'm using while writing since often I need to move around the figures, but for the final version I'll remove the code fields (using the Find feature is easy).

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Stefan Blom 352.7K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
    2014-06-07T22:57:34+00:00

    I wouldn't trust master documents at all, if I were you. The article I linked to was written a while back, but there is no evidence that the feature has been fixed.

    As far as other solutions are concerned, there used to be articles by Steve Hudson on the topic, but I don't know if they are still available. See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/general/whymasterdocscorrupt.htm.

    As I wrote, I'd use INCLUDETEXT fields instead, or why not keep the entire document in one file...

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments