How to display figure number only in cross reference

Anonymous
2012-03-09T17:01:27+00:00

Is there a way to have a cross reference to a figure only display the number, without displaying the label?

For example, I want to reference several figures at once, so it is most natural to say "see Figures 1,3,6, and 9".  It is less natural to say "see Figure 1, Figure 3, Figure 6, and Figure 9",

Microsoft 365 and Office | Word | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments
Answer accepted by question author
Stefan Blom 352.7K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
2012-03-09T19:53:23+00:00

After you have inserted the cross-reference, add a so-called numeric picture switch to specify a number format. To do that, press Alt+F9 to display field codes; you'll find that the cross-references are REF fields. Add # "0" to the end of the relevant REF fields. Press Alt+F9 again to hide the codes, and press F9 to update fields in the selection.

Alternatively, manually add a bookmark around the figure number and then insert a cross-reference to the bookmark text.

Was this answer helpful?

100+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments
Answer accepted by question author
Stefan Blom 352.7K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
2012-03-15T22:46:33+00:00

OK, if heading numbering is included with the captions, you can't use the workaround with the numeric switch.

Edit: You actually can use a numeric switch; see Suzanne's article at http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm.

As previously suggested, you can add a bookmark around the caption number and insert a cross-reference to bookmark text. Alternatively, use the "kludgy" workaround in the article at http://wordfaqs.mvps.org/CombineXrefs.htm.

Was this answer helpful?

10+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments

55 additional answers

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2014-06-07T01:08:36+00:00

    Duarte

    This could be a syntax issue.

    All the earlier examples in this thread include a space and double quotes around the format eg # "0.0"

    Your listed examples don't. I note that Suzanne's article doesn't use the double quotes either though.

    That said, I just had a fiddle in Word and it didn't appear to make a difference if I include a space after the hash or not. In Word 2010 the elegant method just didn't give me the result it looked like it should according to Suzanne's article.

    If I needed to do this then I would be inserting bookmarks to just the caption number and then point a cross-ref at that bookmark instead. It appears that this method aligns with Suzanne's 'kludge' method.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments
  2. Stefan Blom 352.7K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
    2014-04-15T18:46:56+00:00

    Unfortunately, no, it isn't possible to create custom formats. In the Cross-reference dialog box, you will see the available predefined formats.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments
  3. Anonymous
    2014-04-15T13:38:58+00:00

    And now, is it possible to create a custom cross-reference "template", named "Figure, number only", that would automatically include # "0" in the reference code upon creation of the cross-reference? That would be just great :-)

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments