Quote : There was a time that OOXML support in OpenOffice forks was terrible. Now it’s not so bad, at least in LibreOffice. It’s good enough that I suggest that LibreOffice users switch to OOXML file formats as the default, and rely on ODT only as a fall-back
for situations where OpenOffice can’t successfully save without corrupting the file (which is no longer commonplace). I fully expect that at some time in the near future OpenOffice developers will have enough confidence to switch to OOXML as the default file
format. Even if they don’t, the ability to switch is so simple it really doesn’t matter. For all practical purposes LibreOffice has full support of both ODT and OOXML.
I don’t think any company or organization is forcing any other company or organization to adopt OOXML. The standards body chose OOXML as the standard. Microsoft adopted the standard as default, which means most files will be in OOXML file format. OpenOffice
retains ODT as the default, but has full support for OOXML (at least in LibreOffice). It seems to me to be a no-brainer for everyone to use OOXML as the default, but no one is forcing anybody to do so. Switching to OOXML in LibreOffice is trivial - just one
click in a setting. No big deal there.
End of quote
It's weird, you seem to know what you are talking about ( MVP ! ) but all your poitns are non sense.
OOXML wasn't chosen as "the standard" actually aven MSOffice stil does not really implement this "standard" which is OOXML STRICT. 2007 and 2010 implement the ECMA and transitional which is nothing but blobs in XML .
Do you understand that Blob in XML cannot be standard ? You shoud start with this.
Then nodoby should use OOXML to exchange files are you are really not Sure if anybody will be able to open it correctly ( even with MSOFFICE ! )
ODF 1.2 , as fully supported in Office 2013 seems to be a better choice by now.