A family of Microsoft relational database management systems designed for ease of use.
Microsoft are still interested in the end user consumer market but not the small-time business developer.
If the trend carries on like this, they will no doubt do away with Access completely. Three versions on the trot now have dumbed down the product.
The first sentence is different from what you originally stated. I'm not sure if MS was ever really interested in the small time developer.
I also strongly disagree with your statements that Access WAS " (up to 2003) an excellent small business development tool.". I think it remains an excellent small business development tool. You refer to the Runtime version. Well its now free whereas, in 2003, you had to purchase a Developer's Edition. The "sophisticated security model" was quirky, cumbersome and disdained by myself and many other professional developers I know of. I know people bemoan the loss of ADP, but ODBC remains a more than viable way to use Access as a front end to SQL Server and other databases. The Upsizing Wizard was replaced by SSMA which, according to what I hear is better and more recommended. And yes I also bemoan the loss of Pivot tables and dbf support.
And what "trend" are you referring to? You cite things that have been removed but don't talk about what has been added like linking to Sharepoint lists, Web apps, data macros, and other features. So this trend you refer to is one-sided and, in no way indicates a trend towards dropping Access.
The reason I responded to post here is because I see a lot of one-sided inaccurate hogwash being posted. And felt the need to present a different, more factual viewpoint.