A family of Microsoft relational database management systems designed for ease of use.
Access 2013 - Dbase (.dbf) Table Import option
I need to be able to import read/write Dbase dbf tables - yes they are still around so why has the standard option that was in Access 2010 gone?
I have seen mention of ISAM, which is gobbledegook to me. So please a simple answer - what do I need to install or change and how do I do it?
Microsoft 365 and Office | Access | For home | Windows
Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.
158 additional answers
Sort by: Most helpful
-
Anonymous
2014-07-21T22:30:39+00:00 Actually that isn't an option for us. MS won't sell Access 2010 and won't let me downgrade an Access 2013 to 2010.
-
George Hepworth 23,120 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator2014-06-24T22:41:18+00:00 I feel the pain here, but I think there might be a bit of a problem with the statement "They should fix it to keep their promise of 'compatibility'."
I don't think MS ever promised to maintain 100% compatibility with every possible software application forever. Suggesting that they should do so with the .dbf format is an over-reach.
Another option which is 100% viable is to use Access 2010 to link to .dbf files, if that is required by your business.
George
-
Anonymous
2014-06-24T21:53:56+00:00 It is really a shame to see Microsoft removing some existing functionality of linking/importing .DBF files in Access 2013. They should fix it to keep their promise of 'compatibility'.
Thanks for the workaround using Excel to open/export DBF files. But I understand it is not feasible if you have a lot of DBF files.
-
Anonymous
2014-04-28T13:16:54+00:00 Just a quick question - how does Microsoft conduct their "research" into who is using what?
Is my turning off the "help Microsoft improve. . ." option hurting me in the long run since MS doesn't see what I'm using which makes what I'm using eligible for removal because not enough people are "using" it?