Hi everyone
Before we go running off to find the light switch .(last one to leave - turn off the lights) . take a breather . .
I have used MSA since version 1 . . and have watched it grow.
Sadly it seams MSA has been the Cinderella program . . always over shadowed by the ugly sisters . . Word/Excell and the cousins . . powerpoint . .etc
I recall in 1995 - going to the launch of MS-Office95 . . i think around july - in Sydney. It was the only time I got excited about a new program version coming out . .We all eagerly listened to the fabulous new features we could expect . . hhmmmm . . only
worthwhile real improvement . . you could convert a text box to a combo box . . wow !!!
But the the Big surprise . .hooray !!! . . MSO was shipping without MSA because it wasnt finished.
We would get an upgrade coupon . . for Xmas. And when it did arrive it was rubbish.
So 1996 was a bad year . . all the sort of stuff that is happening now happened with MSA95 . .
Finally MSA97 was released and we could upgrade with conifdence. My enterpise system is still running - smoothly on MSA97.
Sadly MS dropped the baby in 1999 rushing to solve the terror of Y2K . . and created another crock . . MSA2000 . . but bounced back with MSA XP and MSA2003.
So if we consider the cycle . . a good version is just around the corner . .(Nathan where are you?)
As for "other products" there are many alternartes to word / excell even powerpoint and outlook . . but is there really anything that stacks up to Access as a user-friendly RDBMS . .
It should be the flagship product - centralising datas management with the other programs supporting it. . . Why does Outlook not use Jet as the backend? Such a natural choice - so MSA can be be the data management system with Outlook as its email agent
- in a unified structure . . not loose linking . .
anyway enough ranting . . i am optimistic . . they will fix it . . wont they . .
cheers
Paulg