Date format problem in Mail Merge - Word 2010

Anonymous
2011-05-04T05:45:56+00:00

How do you change the date format in Mail Merge - Word 2010?

In the data file the date is fomated as DD-MMM-YY, yet in the merge document it appears as MMM/D/YY?

Microsoft 365 and Office | Word | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Paul Edstein 82,871 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
2011-05-04T06:38:39+00:00

Word has a number of different methods of connecting to mail merge data sources, including DDE and OLE DB. Word 2002 and later use the OLE DB coonection by default, though you can change this (to DDE, for example). To work around a limitation in the OLE DB provider used to get data from Excel etc., when Word is connected to an OLE DB data source, it treats dates as if they are in the US mm/dd/yy format, regardless of the format in Excel, your regional settings etc. Applying a date format switch fixes that - and gives the mailmerge document the ability to format the date independently of whatever format is used in the data source.

To get the date format you want, you can add a formatting picture switch as follows:

• select the mergefield;

• press Shift-F9 to expose the field coding. It should look something like {MERGEFIELD MyDate} where 'MyDate' is your mergefield's name;

• delete anything appearing after the mergefield's name and add '@ "dd-MMM-yy"' to the field, as in {MERGEFIELD MyDate @ "d MMMM yyyy"}. With this switch your date will come out as '2 August 2008'. Other possible date formatting switches include:

. @ "dddd, d MMMM yyyy";

. @ "ddd, d MMMM yyyy";

. @ "d MMM yyyy";

. @ "dd/MMM/yyyy".

Note: Note: you can swap the d, M, y expressions around, but you must use uppercase 'M's for months - lowercase 'm's are for minutes.

• position the cursor anywhere in this field and press F9 to update it;

• run your mailmerge.

Was this answer helpful?

700+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments

78 additional answers

Sort by: Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2017-08-12T06:37:39+00:00

    Why not do the experiments and see for yourself what actually happens in the type of scenario I have described? "Should" is fine as an initial hypothesis but sometimes does not turn out to be correct.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Paul Edstein 82,871 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
    2017-08-12T06:39:29+00:00

    I did - and that's the basis on which I replied...

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2017-08-12T07:22:36+00:00

    It's not what happens here, and I have done such experiments in the past with the same results. So there may be some additional factor which causes a difference in behaviour. But *if* the user has such fields and switches in their document they should at least check what I said.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2017-09-19T14:50:14+00:00

    Hello, this works well with 1 date being entered, however I have been unsuccessful when there is a date span entered. I have formatted doing the SHIFT+F9, however it will only pull the first date. When I remove it, the date span works great, however then the 1 date entries pull as 42899. Do you have any solutions for that?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments