Heading 2 numbering not resetting to follow preceding Heading 1.

Anonymous
2011-02-24T03:04:29+00:00

I have a document in Word 2007 that I have created for use as a template. I have done this via the modification of another document that was already fomatted with TOC, headers and footers, page numbers, heading numbering etc. I have been modifying/creating new "styles" rather than just formatting text.

This all seems to be working well except for heading 2 numbering, which is not resetting to follow the preceding heading 1 number. For example: -

  1. Heading 1; is followed by 1.1, 1.2, 1.3
  2. Heading 2; followed by 1.4,1.5..... (carried on from previous list)

Heading 3 is resetting to follow the preceding heading as it should (i.e. 1.2 is followed by 1.2.1, 1.2.2 etc.).

There is no "restart numbering" option when I right click over the numbering in text. When I try to modify Heading 2 in Styles and select format>numbering the field does not recognise that the numbering is secong tier (i.e. 1.1, 1.2..etc) and only shows first tier options (i.e. 1, 2, 3...etc). I cannot seem to find any option in the modify style dialogue box to link the numbering.

When I base heading 2 on heading 1, formatting reverts to mimic heading 1 exactly and I cannot then reformat heading 2 to second tier numbering using the modify dialogue box as once again it is only recognising first tier numbering. The heading 2 that I am using is currently based on heading 2 from the original document and has been re-labelled "heading 2 VE".    

I know that not building the document from scratch is naughty but I'm only mediocre at MS word and it would take me ages. Please tell me there's a simple trick and I don't have to start again!

Microsoft 365 and Office | Word | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Anonymous
2012-06-15T15:32:23+00:00

Did you try using  the built-in numbering scheme before you  created one from scratch?  If you don't have any customizations to the number formatting or style, indents, and such, the built-in scheme is all you need.

You can "start over" by putting the cursor in the first heading 1, clicking the multilevel list icon, and in the list gallery, clicking the built-in numbering badge that shows this:  1 Heading 1, 1.1 Heading, 1.1.1 Heading 3, etc.

Even if you want only minor customizations, though, you may want a list style in your template. So after you have applied the built-in number scheme and with the cursor still in  the first heading 1, go back to the list gallery and click Define new List Style (name the list style) > Format  > Numbering.  The dialog will show all the settings of the current list (where the cursor is) except that no headings will be linked to the numbering levels.  Customize the settings and add the heading links. 

One of the advantages of starting with a built-in list is that the number fields and restarts are already there and correct.   But the biggest one is that you don't have to do all of those steps and clicks!

Pam

Was this answer helpful?

100+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
Suzanne S Barnhill 279.4K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
2011-02-24T03:23:17+00:00

You must set up the heading numbering as a multilevel list linked to the heading styles. If you select the 1 Heading 1, 1.1 Heading 2, 1.1.1 Heading 3 list type in the Multilevel List gallery, the list levels will be linked to the styles automatically, will have the numbering you want, and will restart after higher levels. For more on this, seehttp://www.shaunakelly.com/word/numbering/numbering20072010.html.

Once the numbering is linked to the styles, you can modify the formatting of the styles any way you like (in the Modify Style dialog) except wrt numbering; any changes to the numbering or indents (left or hanging) must be made in the Define New Multilevel List dialog.

Was this answer helpful?

100+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments

61 additional answers

Sort by: Newest
  1. Stefan Blom 352.5K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
    2015-01-27T15:13:36+00:00

    Just like Suzanne, I'd like to clarify that it's not about being interested in MacWord or not; it's about knowing enough about MacWord in order to provide the best help. So it's best to go to the MacWord forum, where users of Word for Macintosh hang out. :-)

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Charles Kenyon 170.9K Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
    2015-01-27T13:48:31+00:00

    Adding to Suzanne's response, sometimes Shauna's website does not work. Here is a link to an archival version of that page. Archive How to create numbered headings or outline numbering in Word 2007 and Word 2010

    Word's automatic numbering is perplexing. It does work as designed so is not a "bug." It does not work the way most users might expect, though. If you follow the steps in Shauna Kelly's web page though, it will work. I have no experience using the Swedish version but expect that it is a language gloss on the program rather than changes to the program. I have used Word for the Mac, although not recently. Word was originally developed for the Mac and ported to Windows. I have not heard of numbering differences between the Mac and Windows version. The people on the Mac forum would know.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Suzanne S Barnhill 279.4K Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
    2015-01-27T13:26:43+00:00

    It's very unlikely to be an actual bug, and it's not that we're not interested in Word for Mac, just that there are more users who are more familiar with the Mac version at http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac/forum/macword. It is very likely that if you follow the instructions in Shauna's article exactly (even though they were written for WinWord), you will have success.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments