SOLUTION TO ERROR " Your network access was interrupted. To continue close the database and then open it again." __

Anonymous
2010-11-02T01:50:09+00:00

SOLUTION TO ERROR " Your network access was interrupted. To continue close the database and then open it again."

Microsoft 365 and Office | Access | For home | Windows

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

91 answers

Sort by: Newest
  1. Anonymous
    2014-04-30T14:04:05+00:00

    I can re-create this error on my local machine, using only a single Access file with local tables. I am running Access 2013, on Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit with SP1. I have two local tables, about 25,000 records each. I am opening table 1 and using a keyfield from that to select one record from the second table. My code looks like this:

    While Not NewData.EOF

        i = i + 1

        Forms![frmStatus]![lblProcess].Caption = "Processing " & i & " of " & NewData.RecordCount & ": " & NewData![LPE ID]

        DoEvents

        SQLstr = "SELECT * FROM [Control Master] WHERE (([MasterIndex])=" & NewData![MasterIndex] & ");"

        Set Archive = db.OpenRecordset(SQLstr)

        If NewData![Sales Order No] <> Archive![Sales Order No] Then

            Set Archive = Nothing

            SQLstr = "UPDATE [Control Master] SET [Sales Order No]='" & NewData![Sales Order No] & "' " _

                & "WHERE (([MasterIndex])=" & NewData![MasterIndex] & ");"

            DoCmd.RunSQL SQLstr

            SQLstr = "INSERT INTO [ChangeList] ( [CPEID], [Sales Order], [Product Code] ) " _

                & "VALUES ( '" & NewData![LPE ID] & "', '" & NewData![Sales Order No] & "', '" _

                & NewData![Part Code] & "' );"

            DoCmd.RunSQL SQLstr

        End If

        NewData.MoveNext

    Wend

    After about 1000 records, it fails on the OpenRecordset statement with "Your network access was interrupted..." I have tried it both with and without the status form telling me how many records have been processed. It never fails on the same record. This is a very basic loop and very basic table update. I cannot see how there is anything from the network that would cause this error.

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2014-04-20T09:57:25+00:00

    I could not agree with you more. I am close to giving up on Microsoft altogether. It is a shame because Access was a great development tool for a small user base.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2014-04-20T09:53:52+00:00

    Did you ever find a solution to this issue?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2014-02-27T22:38:22+00:00

    I have been having this problem for a number of months - ever since we upgraded some of our laptops to Windows 7 and upgraded to Office 2010 as a result. It IS extremely frustrating, especially as there seems to be no answer!  

    Our setup uses a shared database back-end over a simple network of around 8 PCs, (wired and wireless). I guess our problem is compounded by having the shared back-end stored on a Linux server - however, this was all fine when we had Windows XP! The problem was quickly identified to be whenever you access the network for something else, e.g. we have shared documents too, Word and Publisher files etc., the Access database link was broken - guaranteed. If you were lucky there was a window of opportunity which could be exploited if you opened and closed the other file quickly enough you could return to the database without the link being broken. Things seemed to have gotten worse recently, hence my post as a result of increased frustration. We always had the same problem and seemingly "random" occasions also, but I had always suspected (and still do) that these are other activities with the network (that I neither know about or understand) that are affecting the link. Especially any period of inactivity was likely to result in this error. Now, however, it can happen every 5 minutes.

    I looked at upsizing to the Express version of SQL but it's just not as easy as Access to get the things done that we want to do, that's the beauty of Access I suppose. It's frustrating because it worked beautifully and now it doesn't. It's more tempting (and MUCH cheaper) to go back to XP than to upsize to SQL, but this seems silly. Windows 8 didn't make any improvement either. I'm yet to try Office 2013 or Windows 8.1 but I haven't heard that either of these is a miracle cure.

    I'm getting desperate. I believe nobody makes a database better than Access for what we need which puts me in control of the database, but I have looked at what the competition can do and Microsoft will lose my custom if they're not careful and once I'm not using Access I won't need Windows either!

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Tom van Stiphout 40,216 Reputation points MVP Volunteer Moderator
    2014-02-23T07:08:37+00:00

    Sorry you are upset. Shouting is not going to get this fixed.

    Let's try to be rational about it. You claim it's an Access problem; others (and I count myself among them) claim it's a network problem. You don't believe that.

    Can we agree on a test? As long as your network is in play the disagreement may continue and you're getting nowhere, so let's take that out of the equation: if you can reproduce the error while all the files are on the local machine, you will have a stronger case to make. Or if you can setup a test at a friend or two's networks and the error continues to appear, you will again have a stronger case to make.

    Another way to side-step the issue is to upsize your back-end database to the free Express edition of SQL Server. It "never" corrupts and is not sensitive to network discontinuities.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments