Outlook sort by name, but can't jump to name

Anonymous
2023-05-16T15:40:26+00:00

I just tried the NEW outlook.

I can sort by names A-Z, but then I have to scroll to find the person.

The old outlook, I could just type the first letter and it would jump to that name.

Is there a setting in the new outlook that allows you to jump to the letter when typed?

Outlook | Windows | Classic Outlook for Windows | For home

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

149 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2025-05-13T22:04:53+00:00

    still not solved.

    new outlook is complete garbage

    Was this answer helpful?

    7 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2024-04-19T09:12:16+00:00

    I'm reading this thread with exactly the same issue, a year later and it still has not been addressed? Or has it and I missed the solution>

    Was this answer helpful?

    7 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2024-03-12T18:19:22+00:00

    Was this answer helpful?

    7 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2024-01-30T14:27:42+00:00

    The removal of this feature makes me think that people at Microsoft do not use their product. You cannot tell me they have not sorted by name then started typing the name to find all emails from that person. This is used by literally everyone who uses Outlook daily. This should have been discovered before releasing the "new" outlook. The fact this has been posted so long ago and not corrected is annoying.

    Was this answer helpful?

    7 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2023-10-31T17:47:47+00:00

    Absolutely agree, lack of this basic utility makes me want to revert back to the old version of Outlook. With 30K emails, scrolling is a pain.

    Was this answer helpful?

    6 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments