People like Karl here are on these forums to explain to you that the fault lies with you, not Microsoft. In other words they won't help but will give you the ol'microsoft two step shuffle, "you must, sir, contact the manufacturer of x, or I can
transfer you to another department. Thank you for calling Microsoft".
People "like Karl" are here to explain the realities of life in terms of "what is" whether you happen to agree with or understand those or not and where possible provide answers or alternative options (if available) whether someone likes those answers or
alternatives or not.
On a more general basis - every software vendor has the right to define what their solution does and will encompass. In the case of "sync'ing" Outlook data - it is an option that MS left to 3rd party vendors and to the vendors who manufacture/sell their
products (which, I might add, would be the same choice I would have made). The alternative is to assume the <absolutely impossible> responsibility to immediately become familiar with any intricate details of what any other (device or application) vendor may
have made (or will make in the future until the end of time) over which they (MS) have absolutely no control.
To put this another way - let's say that you, personally, decide to design and unleash the latest and greatest application/device upon the world a year from now that claims to interact with Outlook at some level..........
Are you now also suggesting
- That it suddenly becomes Microsoft's immediate responsibility to "integrate every version of Outlook, past, present and future (i.e. sync as an example) with
your new <must have> device/application"?
- That, if you, the vendor, didn't implement something correctly, that it becomes Microsoft's problem to resolve
your error in your product with full access to your proprietary technology?
- That is it simply inconceivable that you could possibly make a mistake anywhere along the line?
- That you should be prohibited from releasing your product until Microsoft decides
you are allowed to do so based on the requirement that unless and until 100% of all potential users stipulate there are no issues using
your device/application with Outlook?
If anyone thinks the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions, then we're obviously living in two different dimensions of reality but it would be even more interesting to see an explanation from someone of how they would accomplish that objective without having a single person out of a population of millions complain about <anything> related to this new device/application even if it is regarding something that the device/application was never designed to do.
People "like Karl" would love to see that explanation.