Microsoft... clearly this was a change that was not necessary. I'm in continuous improvement, so I get it, but I have to remind you of a quote a heard a while ago that perfectly applies to this situation.
"Change for the sake of change is no improvement at all, only a wasteful allocation of time and resources."
Many of the comments on this topic reference that the location is 'right' or 'wrong'. I am going to not use those words and instead ask why, after so many years of us getting used to them where they were, are the 2 search features now combined? I too want it back where it used to be, not because it does or does not 'make sense', but because we are all creatures of habit and muscle memory or familiarity with a program of any kind is the first component of efficiency. Unnecessary changes like this simply screw with user efficiency, which leads to frustration, which leads to complaining, which leads to more inefficiency, etc., etc., etc.
Thank you for your time.
Scott